Luxist Web Search

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Janus v. AFSCME - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janus_v._AFSCME

    Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, No. 16-1466, 585 U.S. ___ (2018), abbreviated Janus v.AFSCME, was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court on US labor law, concerning the power of labor unions to collect fees from non-union members.

  3. Eisenstadt v. Baird - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eisenstadt_v._Baird

    Eisenstadt v. Baird, 405 U.S. 438 (1972), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court that established the right of unmarried people to possess contraception on the same basis as married couples.

  4. Vacco v. Quill - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacco_v._Quill

    Vacco v. Quill, 521 U.S. 793 (1997), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding the right to die.It ruled 9-0 that a New York ban on physician-assisted suicide was constitutional, and preventing doctors from assisting their patients, even those terminally ill and/or in great pain, was a legitimate state interest that was well within the authority of the state ...

  5. Pace v. Alabama - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pace_v._Alabama

    Pace v. Alabama, 106 U.S. 583 (1883), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court affirmed that Alabama's anti-miscegenation statute was constitutional. This ruling was rejected by the Supreme Court in 1964 in McLaughlin v. Florida and in 1967 in Loving v. Virginia. Pace v. Alabama is one of the oldest interracial sex court case in America.

  6. List of United States Supreme Court cases involving ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Lester B. Orfield, A Resume of Decisions of the United States Supreme Court on Federal Criminal Procedure, 30 Ky. L.J. 360 (1942). Lester B. Orfield, A Resume of Decisions of the United States Supreme Court on Federal Criminal Procedure, 7 Mo. L. Rev. 263 (1942).

  7. Yick Wo v. Hopkins - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yick_Wo_v._Hopkins

    Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886), was the first case where the United States Supreme Court ruled that a law that is race-neutral on its face, but is administered in a prejudicial manner, is an infringement of the Equal Protection Clause in the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

  8. Meyer v. Nebraska - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meyer_v._Nebraska

    The Hamilton County Attorney entered the classroom and discovered Parpart reading from the Bible in German. He charged Meyer with violating the Siman Act. Meyer was tried and convicted in the district court for Hamilton County, and was fined $25 (about $340 in 2021 dollars). The Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed his conviction by a vote of 4 to 2 ...

  9. Davis v. County School Board of Prince Edward County - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davis_v._County_School...

    The first plaintiff listed was Dorothy E. Davis, a 14-year old ninth grader. The case was titled Dorothy E. Davis, et al. versus County School Board of Prince Edward County, Virginia. The students' request was unanimously rejected by a three-judge panel of the U.S. District Court. "We have found no hurt or harm to either race," the court ruled.