Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Learn about the definition, purpose, and process of software technical review, a form of peer review that examines the suitability and quality of software products. Find out how it differs from software walkthroughs and inspections, and what roles and participants are involved.
A software requirements specification (SRS) is a document that describes a software system to be developed. It lists functional and non-functional requirements, use cases, design constraints, and other information to establish an agreement between customers and contractors or suppliers.
Code review is a software quality assurance activity in which one or more people check a program, mainly by viewing and reading parts of its source code. Learn about different types of code review processes, such as formal inspections, walk-throughs, and change-based reviews, and how they can improve code quality, defect detection, and learning.
IEEE 829-2008 was a standard that specified the form of documents for software and system testing. It has been superseded by ISO/IEC/IEEE 29119-3:2013 and is used in various certification courses and methodologies.
Software testing is the act of checking whether software satisfies expectations and finding bugs or requirements gaps. Learn about the history, economics, levels, and approaches of software testing, such as automated, static, dynamic, and exploratory testing.
ISO/IEC 29119 is a series of five international standards for software testing, covering concepts, processes, documentation, techniques, and assessment. Learn about the history, structure, contents, and controversy of this standard.
Learn about the process and activities of software quality management, which aims to develop and manage the quality of software products and services. Find out how software quality management is linked to various project management, development, and IT operation methods and standards.
The most obvious value of software reviews (especially formal reviews) is that they can identify issues earlier and more cheaply than they would be identified by testing or by field use (the "defect detection process") [citation needed]. The cost to find and fix a defect by a well-conducted review may be one or two orders of magnitude less than ...