Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
June 30, 2023. January 8, 2024. Chiaverini v. City of Napoleon, Ohio. 23-50. Whether Fourth Amendment malicious prosecution claims are governed by the charge-specific rule, as the Second, Third, and Eleventh Circuits hold, or by the "any crime" rule, as the Sixth Circuit holds. December 13, 2023.
U.S. Const. amends. II, XIV. New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022), abbreviated NYSRPA v. Bruen and also known as NYSRPA II or Bruen to distinguish it from the 2020 case, is a landmark decision [1] [2] [3] of the United States Supreme Court related to the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution.
Korematsu v. United States, 323 U.S. 214 (1944), was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that upheld the internment of Japanese Americans from the West Coast Military Area during World War II. The decision has been widely criticized, [1] with some scholars describing it as "an odious and discredited artifact of popular ...
In a 6-3 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court said a three-judge panel erred when ruling South Carolina’s -congressional map is unconstitutional. ... “I commend today’s Supreme Court decision ...
The Supreme Court decision also means that HR leaders are going to have to work directly with more employees than ever before, according to Lauren Hartz, a partner at law firm Jenner & Block, who ...
Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. 644 (2020), is a landmark [1] United States Supreme Court civil rights decision in which the Court held that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects employees against discrimination because of sexuality or gender identity. The plaintiff, Gerald Bostock, was fired from his county job after he ...
Texas v. Johnson. Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held, 5–4, that burning the Flag of the United States was protected speech under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, as doing so counts as symbolic speech and political speech .
The Supreme Court will also consider this question in the coming weeks. Its decision could change the power of US bankruptcy courts to approve agreements that extinguish the liabilities of parties ...