Luxist Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Brandon Teena - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandon_Teena

    In August 2011, a three-judge panel of the Eighth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected John Lotter's appeal in a split decision. In October 2011, the Eighth Circuit rejected Lotter's request for a rehearing by the panel or the full Eighth Circuit en banc. Lotter next petitioned the Supreme Court of the United States for a review of his case.

  3. Glik v. Cunniffe - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glik_v._Cunniffe

    Glik v. Cunniffe, 655 F.3d 78 (1st Cir. 2011) is a case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit held that a private citizen has the right to record video and audio of police carrying out their duties in a public place, and that the arrest of the citizen for a wiretapping violation violated his First and Fourth Amendment rights.

  4. Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Accounting Oversight ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Enterprise_Fund_v...

    Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, 561 U.S. 477 (2010), was a 5–4 decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that laws enabling inferior officers of the United States to be insulated from the Presidential removal authority with two levels of "for cause" removal violated Article Two of the United States Constitution.

  5. Lana Tisdel - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lana_Tisdel

    Lana M. Tisdel (born May 28, 1975) [2] is an American woman whose early life and involvement with the December 1993 murders of Brandon Teena, Lisa Lambert, and Phillip DeVine at the hands of John Lotter and Tom Nissen is chronicled in the 1998 documentary The Brandon Teena Story and the 1999 film Boys Don't Cry (which left out DeVine). [3]

  6. Rucho v. Common Cause - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rucho_v._Common_Cause

    Rucho v. Common Cause, No. 18-422, 588 U.S. 684 (2019) is a landmark case of the United States Supreme Court concerning partisan gerrymandering. The Court ruled that while partisan gerrymandering may be "incompatible with democratic principles", the federal courts cannot review such allegations, as they present nonjusticiable political questions outside the jurisdiction of these courts.

  7. Korematsu v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korematsu_v._United_States

    Korematsu v. United States, 323 U.S. 214 (1944), was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that upheld the internment of Japanese Americans from the West Coast Military Area during World War II. The decision has been widely criticized, [1] with some scholars describing it as "an odious and discredited artifact of popular ...

  8. Minnesota v. Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnesota_v._Mille_Lacs...

    Thomas. Minnesota v. Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians, 526 U.S. 172 (1999), was a United States Supreme Court decision concerning the usufructuary rights of the Ojibwe (Chippewa) tribe to certain lands it had ceded to the federal government in 1837. The Court ruled that the Ojibwe retained certain hunting, fishing, and gathering rights on ...

  9. US Supreme Court leans toward Jan. 6 rioter in obstruction ...

    www.aol.com/news/us-supreme-court-tackles...

    By John Kruzel and Andrew Chung. WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Conservative U.S. Supreme Court justices on Tuesday signaled skepticism toward an obstruction charge brought by the Justice Department ...