Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
On the whole, PPP per capita figures are less spread than nominal GDP per capita figures. [5] The rankings of national economies over time have changed considerably; the United States surpassed the British Empire 's output around 1916, [6] which in turn had surpassed the Qing dynasty in aggregate output decades earlier.
An interactive map with estimated data for 2024 from the IMF, using GDP based on purchasing power parity (PPP) per capita, shown in current international dollars. [1] $10,000 – $15,000 $15,000 – $20,000 $20,000 – $30,000 $30,000 – $45,000 $45,000 – $60,000 $60,000 – $90,000 $90,000 – $150,000
This discrepancy has large implications; for instance, when converted via the nominal exchange rates, GDP per capita in India is about US$1,965 while on a PPP basis, it is about US$7,197. At the other extreme, Denmark's nominal GDP per capita is around US$53,242, but its PPP figure is US$46,602, in line with other developed nations.
This title is currently a redirect to Gross domestic product#Cross-border comparison and purchasing power parity; click there to go to the current target. The full content of this redirect page, including all redirect categories, is displayed below.
List of Chinese administrative divisions by GDP per capita; Historical specific. List of countries by GDP estimates for 2006 (nominal) List of countries by GDP estimates for 2007 (nominal) List of countries by past GDP (nominal) – for the years between 1998 and 2003; List of countries by past GDP (PPP) – for the periods between 1 CE and 1998 CE
Countries by median wealth ( US dollars) per adult. From 2021 publication of Credit Suisse. This is a list of countries of the world by wealth per adult or household, from sources such as UBS 's annual Global Wealth Databook [1] and the OECD 's Better Life Index. [2] Wealth includes both financial and non-financial assets.
This is an alphabetical list of countries by past and projected gross domestic product per capita, based on official exchange rates, not on the purchasing power parity (PPP) methodology. Values are given in USDs and have not been adjusted for inflation.
The difference in the Roman and Byzantine GDP (PPP) per capita is due to the authors operating with differing conversion rates for the subsistence level: $300 in the Roman case (2.1 x $300 = ~$633), $400 in the Byzantine one (1.7 x $400 = $680). This means that Roman GDP (PPP) per capita was around 20% higher than the Byzantine one.