Luxist Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Kronos Incorporated - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kronos_Incorporated

    Kronos Incorporated corporate headquarters in Lowell, MA. Kronos was founded in 1977 by Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and Simon Business School alumnus Mark S. Ain. [4] Under Mark Ain's leadership, Kronos sustained one of the longest records of growth and profitability as a public company in software industry history.

  3. UKG - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UKG

    The company was founded in April 2020 as a result of the merger of Ultimate Software and Kronos Incorporated. [3] Former Kronos CEO Aron Ain was the CEO and chairperson of the combined company until July 1, 2022, when he stepped down as CEO to become Executive Chairperson. [4] On February 20, 2020, Ultimate Software and Kronos Incorporated ...

  4. Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spokeo,_Inc._v._Robins

    Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, 578 U.S. 330 (2016), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court vacated and remanded a ruling by United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on the basis that the Ninth Circuit had not properly determined whether the plaintiff has suffered an "injury-in-fact" when analyzing whether he had standing to bring his case in federal court. [1]

  5. KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KSR_International_Co._v...

    Teleflex sued KSR International, claiming that one of KSR's products infringed Teleflex's patent [2] on connecting an adjustable vehicle control pedal to an electronic throttle control. KSR argued that the combination of the two elements was obvious, and the claim was therefore not patentable. The district court ruled in favor of KSR, [3] but ...

  6. Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burwell_v._Hobby_Lobby...

    Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., 573 U.S. 682 (2014), is a landmark decision [1] [2] in United States corporate law by the United States Supreme Court allowing privately held for-profit corporations to be exempt from a regulation that its owners religiously object to, if there is a less restrictive means of furthering the law's interest, according to the provisions of the Religious Freedom ...

  7. Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamex_Operations_West...

    Dynamex Operations W. v. Superior Court and Charles Lee, Real Party in Interest, 4 Cal.5th 903 (Cal. 2018) was a landmark case handed down by the California Supreme Court on April 30, 2018. A class of drivers for a same-day delivery company, Dynamex, claimed that they were misclassified as independent contractors and thus unlawfully deprived of ...

  8. Corner Post, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corner_Post,_Inc._v._Board...

    t. e. Corner Post, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 603 U.S. ___ (2024), is a United States Supreme Court case about the statute of limitations for judicial review of federal agency rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act. The legal question under review was whether a challenge to the validity of a rule must ...

  9. Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loper_Bright_Enterprises_v...

    The cases were argued by Roman Martinez (on behalf of Relentless), Paul Clement (on behalf of Loper Bright Enterprises), and Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar (on behalf of the United States in both cases). Although Jackson recused herself in the Loper Bright decision, she did hear arguments in the consolidated case, Relentless, Inc. [12]