Ads
related to: arizona superior court caseschecksecrets.com has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
State of Arizona v. Kelli Ward, et al. is a state criminal prosecution concerning the Trump fake electors plot in Arizona.The eighteen defendants, including eleven Arizona Republicans and seven Donald Trump associates, are accused of producing and attempting to use a certificate of ascertainment to falsely claim Trump had won the state's electoral votes in the 2020 U.S. presidential election ...
Under Article 6, section 13, of the Arizona Constitution, " [t]he superior courts provided for in this section shall constitute a single court, composed of all the duly elected or appointed judges in each of the counties of the state." [2] In this sense, the single Superior Court of the State of Arizona is divided into fifteen divisions ...
On December 7, 2020, an Arizona resident filed a lawsuit in Pinal County Superior Court against state officials, including Governor Doug Ducey and Secretary of State Katie Hobbs. The plaintiff alleged a former Coolidge Mayor candidate claimed he worked for the government and participated in a scheme to take fake ballots into the Maricopa County ...
U.S. Const. amend. XIV; Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-502 (A) Clark v. Arizona, 548 U.S. 735 (2006), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld the constitutionality of the insanity defense used by Arizona . The Court affirmed the murder conviction of a man with paranoid schizophrenia for killing a police officer.
Arizona, 536 U.S. 584 (2002) Walton v. Arizona, 497 U.S. 639 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court case that upheld two important aspects of the capital sentencing scheme in Arizona —judicial sentencing and the aggravating factor "especially heinous, cruel, or depraved"—as not unconstitutionally vague. The Court overruled the first of ...
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that law enforcement in the United States must warn a person of their constitutional rights before interrogating them, or else the person's statements cannot be used as evidence at their trial.
Ads
related to: arizona superior court caseschecksecrets.com has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month