Luxist Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. US Supreme Court reverses decision on SB 4, allows Texas ...

    www.aol.com/us-supreme-court-reverses-decision...

    The U.S. Supreme Court in a divided decision Tuesday is allowing Texas to begin enforcing its sweeping immigration law just one day after having extended a hold on the controversial measure, which ...

  3. List of United States Supreme Court immigration case law

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Mendoza-Martinez, 372 U.S. 144 (1963) – the Court struck down a law revoking citizenship for remaining outside the United States in order to avoid conscription into the armed forces. Rosenberg v. Fleuti, 374 U.S. 449 (1963) Foti v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 375 U.S. 217 (1963) Thompson v. INS, 375 U.S. 384 (1964) Costello v.

  4. Padilla v. Kentucky - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Padilla_v._Kentucky

    VI, XIV. Padilla v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356 (2010), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court decided that criminal defense attorneys must advise noncitizen clients about the deportation risks of a guilty plea. The case extended the Supreme Court's prior decisions on criminal defendants' Sixth Amendment right to counsel ...

  5. Pereira v. Sessions - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pereira_v._Sessions

    Pereira v. Sessions, Attorney General, no. 17-459, 585 U.S (2018), is a United States Supreme Court case regarding immigration.In an 8-1 majority, the Court reversed a lower court’s decision by ruling that a Notice to Appear which does not inform a noncitizen when and where to appear for a removal proceeding is not valid under 8 U.S. Code § 1229(b) and therefore does not trigger the stop ...

  6. Remain in Mexico - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remain_in_Mexico

    Administered by the Department of Homeland Security, it requires migrants seeking asylum to remain in Mexico until their US immigration court date. The policy was initially ended by the Biden administration, and after some legal battles, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled on June 30, 2022, in Biden v.

  7. United States v. Texas (2023) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Texas_(2023)

    The court held a bench trial in February 2022 about the legality of the final guidance. On June 10, 2022, the court held the final guidance violated the Administrative Procedure Act, and vacated it. On July 6, 2022, a panel of the Fifth Circuit denied a stay pending appeal, holding the Supreme Court's intervening decision in Garland v.

  8. Niz-Chavez v. Garland - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niz-Chavez_v._Garland

    Niz-Chavez v. Garland, 593 U.S. 155 (2021), was an immigration decision by the United States Supreme Court. In a 6–3 decision authored by Neil Gorsuch, the Court ruled against the federal government, holding that deportation hearing notices need to be in a single document. Although a highly technical case, the decision received attention for ...

  9. US Supreme Court partly revives Arizona's proof of ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/us-supreme-court-partly-revives...

    August 22, 2024 at 2:14 PM. By John Kruzel. WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday revived part of an Arizona voter law requiring documented proof of U.S. citizenship to register ...