Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Executive branch agencies will likely have more difficulty regulating the environment, public health, workplace safety and other issues under a far-reaching decision by the Supreme Court. The ...
Hess-Chevron merger vote appears ripe for narrow approval. By Sabrina Valle. HOUSTON (Reuters) - Hess Corp CEO John Hess has until Tuesday to quell a rebellion by shareholders over his handling of ...
Chevron and other oil firms have been sued by California, which alleges that their production and refining operations have caused billions in damage.
Since being handed down, Chevron had become among the most frequently cited cases in American administrative law. [5] Over 17,000 lower federal court decisions and 70 decisions by the Supreme Court itself cited Chevron. [6] Between 2003 and 2013, circuit courts applied Chevron in 77% of decisions regarding regulatory disputes. [7]
Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court that set forth the legal test used when U.S. federal courts must defer to a government agency's interpretation of a law or statute. [1] The decision articulated a doctrine known as " Chevron deference ". [2] Chevron deference consisted of a two-part ...
In October 2023, Chevron Corporation announced that it would acquire Hess Corporation in an all-stock deal for $53 billion, or $60 billion including debt. [83][84] However, since this would give Chevron control of Hess' 30% interest in the Guyana oil fields, Exxon protested and claim to have a right of first refusal to acquire those assets.
Federal rules that impact virtually every aspect of everyday life, from the food we eat and the cars we drive to the air we breathe, could be at risk after a wide-ranging Supreme Court ruling ...
As a result, in September 1989 the Occupational Safety and Health Administration fined Chevron $877,000 for "willfully failing to provide protective equipment for employees." [14] Chevron employees had "repeatedly requested" protective equipment since the early 1980s but the company had refused despite more than 70 fires in the plant since 1984.