Luxist Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: benefits review california supreme court case lookup by name list

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Save the Plastic Bag Coalition v. City of Manhattan Beach

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Save_the_Plastic_Bag...

    A petition for review was submitted to California Supreme Court by City of Manhattan Beach and on April 21, 2010, the California Supreme Court accepted the City of Manhattan Beach's Petition. On July 14, 2011, by unanimous decision the California Supreme Court upheld the standing of the Save the Plastic Bag Coalition, but reversed the judgment ...

  3. Mathews v. Eldridge - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathews_v._Eldridge

    Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 (1976), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that individuals have a statutorily granted property right in Social Security benefits, and the termination of such benefits implicates due process but does not require a pre-termination hearing. The case is significant in the development of ...

  4. Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamex_Operations_West...

    Applying this test, the Court affirmed the Superior Court's judgment that there were sufficient common interests among Dynamex drivers to certify the class. Dynamex Operations W. v. Superior Court and Charles Lee, Real Party in Interest, 4 Cal.5th 903 (Cal. 2018) was a landmark case handed down by the California Supreme Court on April 30, 2018.

  5. California v. Texas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_v._Texas

    Case or Controversy Clause, U.S. Const. Art. III. California v. Texas, 593 U.S. 659 (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case that dealt with the constitutionality of the 2010 Affordable Care Act (ACA), colloquially known as Obamacare. It was the third such challenge to the ACA seen by the Supreme Court since its enactment.

  6. Saenz v. Roe - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saenz_v._Roe

    Sáenz v. Roe, 526 U.S. 489 (1999), was a landmark case [1] in which the Supreme Court of the United States discussed whether there is a constitutional right to travel from one state to another. [2] The case was a reaffirmation of the principle that citizens select states and not the other way round. [3]

  7. California Democrats, labor leaders vow to fight for Uber ...

    www.aol.com/california-democrats-labor-leaders...

    Union leaders and labor-friendly lawmakers say they’re not giving up on securing benefits and protections for gig workers after the California Supreme Court delivered a win for Uber last week.

  1. Ads

    related to: benefits review california supreme court case lookup by name list