Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The inequality of wealth (i.e. inequality in the distribution of assets) has substantially increased in the United States in recent decades. [2] Wealth commonly includes the values of any homes, automobiles, personal valuables, businesses, savings, and investments, as well as any associated debts. [3][4]
Income inequality has fluctuated considerably in the United States since measurements began around 1915, moving in an arc between peaks in the 1920s and 2000s, with a 30-year period of relatively lower inequality between 1950 and 1980. The U.S. has the highest level of income inequality among its (post-)industrialized peers. [1]
Thus, the top 20% of Americans owned 85% of the country's wealth and the bottom 80% of the population owned 15%. Financial inequality was greater than inequality in total wealth, with the top 1% of the population owning 42.7%, the next 19% of Americans owning 50.3%, and the bottom 80% owning 7%. [53]
Cost-of-living in America is still out of control — use these 3 'real assets' to protect ... some of Buffett’s more unconventional thoughts on wealth inequality are probably worth closer ...
By comparison, it points out, the bottom 50 percent of earners own only 0.5 percent of those investments. It isn't hard to see why there is such a yawning gap between the richest Americans and the ...
Illustration from a 1916 advertisement for a vocational school in the back of a US magazine. Education has been seen as a key to socioeconomic mobility, and the advertisement appealed to Americans' belief in the possibility of self-betterment as well as threatening the consequences of downward mobility in the great income inequality existing during the Industrial Revolution.
The Democratic National Convention trotted out some of the richest and most powerful people in America to lecture the country about wealth inequality and the dangers of the American culture’s ...
Joseph Stiglitz The study found the decline in progressivity since 1960 was due to the shift from allocation of corporate income taxes among labor and capital to the effects of the individual income tax. Paul Krugman also supports this claim saying, "The overall tax rate on these high income families fell from 36.5% in 1980 to 26.7% in 1989." From the White House's own analysis, the federal ...