Luxist Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Cohens v. Virginia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cohens_v._virginia

    Marshall, joined by unanimous. Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat.) 264 (1821), is a landmark case by the Supreme Court of the United States that is most notable for the Court's assertion of its power to review state supreme court decisions in criminal law matters if defendants claim that their constitutional rights have been violated. [1]

  3. Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swann_v._Charlotte...

    Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education. Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, 402 U.S. 1 (1971), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case dealing with the busing of students to promote integration in public schools. [1] The Court held that busing was an appropriate remedy for the problem of racial imbalance in schools ...

  4. Champion v. Ames - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Champion_v._Ames

    Dissent. Fuller, joined by Brewer, Shiras, Peckham. Champion v. Ames, 188 U.S. 321 (1903), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court which held that trafficking lottery tickets constituted interstate commerce that could be regulated by the U.S. Congress under the Commerce Clause .

  5. New Jersey v. T. L. O. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Jersey_v._T._L._O.

    New Jersey v. T. L. O., [fn 1] 469 U.S. 325 (1985), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States which established the standards by which a public school official can search a student in a school environment without a search warrant, and to what extent. The case centered around a student at Piscataway High School in ...

  6. Bostock v. Clayton County - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bostock_v._Clayton_County

    Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. 644 (2020), is a landmark [1] United States Supreme Court civil rights decision in which the Court held that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects employees against discrimination because of sexuality or gender identity. The plaintiff, Gerald Bostock, was fired from his county job after he ...

  7. Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Students_for_Fair...

    Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard, 600 U.S. 181 (2023), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the court held that race-based affirmative action programs in college admissions processes violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

  8. Selective Draft Law Cases - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selective_Draft_Law_Cases

    United States. Arver v. United States, 245 U.S. 366 (1918), also known as the Selective Draft Law Cases, was a United States Supreme Court decision which upheld the Selective Service Act of 1917, and more generally, upheld conscription in the United States. The Supreme Court upheld that conscription did not violate the Thirteenth Amendment 's ...

  9. Janus v. AFSCME - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janus_v._AFSCME

    Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, No. 16-1466, 585 U.S. ___ (2018), abbreviated Janus v. AFSCME, is a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court on US labor law, concerning the power of labor unions to collect fees from non-union members. Under the Taft–Hartley Act of 1947, which applies to the ...