Luxist Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Supreme Court finds no bias against Black voters in a ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/supreme-court-finds-no-bias...

    President Joe Biden, whose administration backed Scott and the other plaintiffs at the Supreme Court, also criticized the ruling. “The Supreme Court’s decision today undermines the basic ...

  3. List of pending United States Supreme Court cases - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_pending_United...

    June 30, 2023. January 8, 2024. Chiaverini v. City of Napoleon, Ohio. 23-50. Whether Fourth Amendment malicious prosecution claims are governed by the charge-specific rule, as the Second, Third, and Eleventh Circuits hold, or by the "any crime" rule, as the Sixth Circuit holds. December 13, 2023.

  4. Supreme Court says panel was wrong in ruling SC ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/supreme-court-says-panel-wrong...

    In a 6-3 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court said a three-judge panel erred when ruling South Carolina’s -congressional map is unconstitutional. ... “I commend today’s Supreme Court decision ...

  5. Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burwell_v._Hobby_Lobby...

    Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., 573 U.S. 682 (2014), is a landmark decision in United States corporate law by the United States Supreme Court allowing privately held for-profit corporations to be exempt from a regulation that its owners religiously object to, if there is a less restrictive means of furthering the law's interest, according to the provisions of the Religious Freedom ...

  6. Kelo v. City of New London - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelo_v._City_of_New_London

    U.S. Const. amend. Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005), [1] was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held, 5–4, that the use of eminent domain to transfer land from one private owner to another private owner to further economic development does not violate the Takings Clause of the Fifth ...

  7. Bostock v. Clayton County - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bostock_v._Clayton_County

    Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. 644 (2020), is a landmark [1] United States Supreme Court civil rights decision in which the Court held that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects employees against discrimination because of sexuality or gender identity. The plaintiff, Gerald Bostock, was fired from his county job after he ...

  8. Trump v. Anderson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_v._Anderson

    The court stayed its decision until a ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court. On January 5, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court granted Trump's petition for a writ of certiorari seeking review of the Colorado Supreme Court ruling in Anderson v. Griswold on an accelerated pace; oral arguments were held on February 8, 2024.

  9. Supreme Court of the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Court_of_the...

    September 29, 2005. The Supreme Court of the United States ( SCOTUS) is the highest court in the federal judiciary of the United States. It has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all U.S. federal court cases, and over state court cases that turn on questions of U.S. constitutional or federal law. It also has original jurisdiction over a ...