Luxist Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Home Depot U. S. A., Inc. v. Jackson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Home_Depot_U._S._A.,_Inc...

    28 U.S.C. §1441, Class Action Fairness Act of 2005. Home Depot U. S. A., Inc. v. Jackson, 587 U.S. ___ (2019), was a United States Supreme Court case which determined that a third-party defendant to a counterclaim submitted in a state-court civil action cannot remove their case to federal court. The Court explained, in a 5–4 decision, that ...

  3. ZF Automotive U. S., Inc. v. Luxshare, Ltd. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZF_Automotive_U._S.,_Inc...

    Laws applied. 28 U.S.C. § 1782. ZF Automotive U. S., Inc. v. Luxshare, Ltd., 596 U.S. ___ (2022), is a decision of the United States Supreme Court on the scope of §1782 of Title 28 of the United States Code. The issue of statutory interpretation for the Court was whether a private commercial arbitral tribunal constitutes a "foreign or ...

  4. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cipollone_v._Liggett_Group...

    Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc., 505 U.S. 504 (1992), was a United States Supreme Court case. In a split opinion, the Court held that the Surgeon General's warning did not preclude lawsuits by smokers against tobacco companies on the basis of several claims. [citation needed]

  5. Rubik's Cube - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rubik's_Cube

    The Rubik's Cube is a 3D combination puzzle invented in 1974 [2] [3] by Hungarian sculptor and professor of architecture Ernő Rubik. Originally called the Magic Cube, [4] the puzzle was licensed by Rubik to be sold by Pentangle Puzzles in the UK in 1978, [5] and then by Ideal Toy Corp in 1980 [6] via businessman Tibor Laczi and Seven Towns ...

  6. Lamps Plus, Inc. v. Varela - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamps_Plus,_Inc._v._Varela

    Lamps Plus, Inc. v. Varela, 587 U.S. ___ (2019), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the use of class arbitration proceedings. In a 5–4 decision, the Supreme Court reversed the Ninth Circuit’s decision and held that arbitration on a classwide basis could not be compelled based on the provision’s ambiguous language. [1]

  7. Daniels v. City of New York - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniels_v._City_of_New_York

    The Daniels et al. v. The City of New York et al. was brought to the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) by Richie Perez of the National Congress of Puerto Rican Rights during the aftermath of the Diallo shooting. The defendants initially argued to dismiss the case, citing a 1983 Supreme Court decision, City of Los Angeles v.

  8. Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_Department_of...

    Texas Dept. of Housing and Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project, Inc., 576 U.S. 519 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court analyzed whether disparate impact claims are cognizable under the Fair Housing Act. [1] In Justice Anthony Kennedy 's majority opinion, the Court held that Congress specifically ...

  9. Stefan P. Kruszewski - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stefan_P._Kruszewski

    Stefan P. Kruszewski. Stefan Philip Kruszewski is an American clinical and forensic psychiatrist, active as a whistleblower in medically related cases. [1] He is principal in the company which bears his name, Stefan P. Kruszewski, M.D. & Associates, P.C. in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. [2]