Michael Kleinmann: PHOTOS: Men's Underwear Goes Red for Summer
Wynonna Judd's 33 Wildest Stage Costumes
Recent Comments:
Six Reasons Barack Obama is Still the Odds-on Favorite in 2012 {Politics Daily}
Mar 8th 2010 2:01PM So, AOL I'm posing a question to you. Are you really going to marginalize Ron Paul again this time around? You realize he just won the CPAC vote, right?
The unstoppable Kevin Trudeau: Infamous infomercial king is at it again {WalletPop}
Dec 4th 2009 1:29PM Nice smear job.
No point to your story.
Only proved he's a businessman who's had to settle some disputes in his past.
Who gave you this story?
It's obvious it's a smear campaign when you put his book in the article and include a 30% of sticker on it! That's a pretty unprofessional thing to do. Can't wait for your book Mitch Lipka, I'll let everyone know they should wait for it to hit the clearance rack.
You may get some people to think negatively of this guy after throwing him under the bus like this, but you've exposed your obvious bias and nefarious intentions. Take a deeper look yourself folks, This guy has been turned into a Pariah by the Pharmaceutical companies... once you know the back story everything fits into place. Now let me ask you one more thing Mitch, would you like people claiming you did things you were never charged or convicted, of such a slanderous nature?
Pentagon to Implant Chips in Soldiers' Bodies {Switched}
Aug 17th 2009 7:36PM Yeah, and if the enemy figures out how to scan, or hack the information just think of the possibilities! An external, harnessed, lightweight, and tiny apparatus connected by probes/clips for monitoring and gps during battle seems good enough.
I have a feeling it's more like the author had started to imply. It's another step closer to putting chips into everyone so they literally can "control and monitor" our lives. Think of it this way. It may still seem far-fetched to some of you. But as time continues on the military will flaunt the succeses of recovering soldiers in battle, or alerting people to medical conditions that are potentially life altering before they even know about it, thus possibly saving their life. On the other side you've got the very real "what if" happening just a few weeks ago with a patent being denied for a microchip sensor with an attached vial of poison... handy if someone deviates from where you want them to go. Beep. Dead.
We are living in a police state here in America, ask the rest of the world and they'll agree. We need to open our eyes.
On Friday I was at a sports restraunt/club where a band was playing. They had hired a professional photographer. As the night wore on I noticed the photographer was no longer taking photos of the band but was lurking off to the side taking photos of women dancing. He started concentrating on the girls who were obviously the most annebriated. He started to get bold when the dancefloor was packed. I wasn't drinking as it was an event for my wife and her friends and I sat and watched this guy start creeping, kneeling and sneeking in on women taking photos of individual "parts" of women. I confronted him as he began to turn his attention to my wife's group because I was SURE they had not asked for pictures and sure didn't know they were being photographed. He told me he was hired by the band and could take all the pictures he wanted. I told him to give me a card... he then flipped on the view screen of his professional camera and started flipping through the pictures he must have gone through 30 pics as fast as he could and they were all of women there at the club (nobody was looking at the camera, if you know what I mean) I demanded a business card... he fumbled around pulled out a stack of cards, they said "EROTIC PHOTOGRAPHY". I told him there was no warning or waiver at the door stating photographs would be used for promotional purposes and were were'nt on private property. The Restaraunt took no action against the guy that night, just said they'd watch him. His girlfriend came up to me later and stated she's repeatedly warned him he was gonna get in trouble some day for doing that, and that it creeps her out too.
My point, this big brother stuff- there's got to be a limit or horrible human and personal rights abuses will abound.
Hurting Luxury Watch Companies Finally Discover Their Sales People Stink {Luxist}
Aug 11th 2009 10:57AM Big mistake Global. It's a very bad idea to dress down when buying things from sales people. It shows a lack of public awareness (shown in your disregard to show yourself as smart, kept and knowledgeable.) Thus, you will almost never be given the lowest price on these items. If you look like this is your first time picking up a large diamond do you think they're trying to give you a "killer" deal to maybe entice you to return? No. The sales person is doing the same thing day after day, let me guarantee with some certainty... we can tell when you're acting, lying, etc. We have our job because we can read people well. And from what I can tell, you're my favorite type of customer. from your "thousands" to burn, and your desire for luxist items to make you feel better about yourself, throw that in with thinking you can trick salesmen by your clothing choice... I hope we cross paths someday! I'm not mad at you, just thinking you've given yourself a reason to buy items... our trick is to always let the customer think they've decided to make the purchase themselves- with someone like you, that becomes very easy.
Jon Minus Kate and My Respect {Politics Daily}
Jun 24th 2009 3:26PM The title of your book "Bitch is the new Black" is a reference to what exactly? From what I can tell of this article you can only see things from one side, so I'm guessing it's in reference to your respect for the opposite sex. The man admitted something on a personal level, that he was maybe too passive in his relationship. Trust me... the American Male has been so drilled (brainwashed) from our earliest years to think negatively about ourselves, not standing up for ourselves stems from that. (we're too aggressive if we get mad at something or want our way, defending our actions) We've become passified, told we must be everything.. sensitive, but don't cry etc... And then you go and say you've lost respect for him because he got married too young and the "passive" thing.
Most people I've encountered say Kates actions are demeaning and cruel and they can't believe the marriage lasted this long. You likened Jon similarly to the way battered wives were treated in the fifties "See, she admitted she made him mad. Thaaat's why he hit her, she said it was her fault... see, she should of just kept her mouth shut, I tell you what I sure have no respect for THAT woman.(Get it?!)
Are you a blogger or does somebody actually pay you to spew hate?
Civilians Run City-Wide Surveillance in Pennsylvania Town {Switched}
Jun 23rd 2009 2:34PM That's not the point. I'd like to think all law enforcement are great people (and in this case it's only citizens, creepy) watching everyones moves. In this article they even stated that they would call in suspicious activity, creating more crime because they caught people doing more minor infractions. I guess I'm not as trusting as you are. Even if I'm perfect (which nobody is) gives the government the right to use video or audio "recordings" without our permission. (It used to be called spying) This stuff shouldn't even be admissable in a court of law.
What if the person operating the cameras has a criminal background (child molester?) and watches the cameras each day...for his job let's say, and he has the ability to zoom in and out.....and he of course ends up paying way too much attention to our sons and daughters on the playground at school. But you know catching someone rolling through a red light, or catching the occasional fight on tape... ok, even helping with an occasional murder like in the article is NO excuse for this type of insane breach of our privacies. (the murder case probably didn't even need the tape, but I digress.) This is it people, what we've all seen coming and we need to stop it sooner than later.
MSNBC's David Schuster Explains 'Teabagging' {Politics Daily}
Apr 14th 2009 11:43AM Rachel- PLEASE READ THIS!
http://www.infowars.com/the-new-world-order-is-taking-over-the-patriot-and-truth-movements/
MSNBC's David Schuster Explains 'Teabagging' {Politics Daily}
Apr 14th 2009 11:20AM Rachel,
I would like to clear something up right now for you. This Tea Party nonsense has very little to do with you Democrats.
Ron Paul has garnered a huge amount of support from longtime and "new" republicans. There has been a lot of talk online and in the main stream media of the Republican leaders trying to capitalize on the efforts of Ron Paul's dramatic presidential campaign, the fund raising efforts and base he formed.
What I mean by this is that they (GOP) are trying this Tea Party tactic to not only steer in potential new conservatives but to keep their base busy and active over the next few years. I'm sure they believe by stirring the pot and creating a sense of anger and resentment that these people will cause trouble for Obama enough to give them a slight chance in 2012.
Here's an interesting thing, they are blatantly trying not to seek out folks who already have been associated with the "true" Tea Party which was started by the Ron Paul "Revolution". The "Revolution" was not only a campaign motto but an impetus to a new way of thinking for a portion of their party, the Libertarian thinkers of the Republican Party.
Proof of this is becoming clear with Fox News "seemingly" stating that this is a revolution started by "the people" and that they have nothing to do with it and the Republican leadership and right wing media pundits are going to be at the events. There seems to be very little underground chatter, no momentum built up by the people on this one. It all just seems so fake, so diluted. Look up Glenn Beck's 912 project. You'll see the absolute fake-ness of this revolution. Ron Paul supporters are not at any of those Tea Parties, they are just stealing SOME of his quotes or slogans and raping them of their original intent.
-Ben in MN
Straw Poll: Dec. 21 - Jan. 4 {Politics Daily}
Dec 24th 2007 10:58PM
I am not crazy.
I am not fringe.
I am not close-minded.
I am one of a growing number of regular Americans that LOVE their country and want to see RON PAUL win the Presidency.
There is a reason why his interviewers attack him and disrespect him when they would never treat any other presidential candidate.
Let these ridiculous attempts to discount his campaign only embolden our movement everyone! The media pundits are making fools out of themselves. It is honestly laughable that they will attack him for 45 minutes, hoping for some kind of slip up and end up with every question answered precisely and without the typical politically ambiguous rhetoric we're all so used to.
Think about 5th grade everyone. Remember you learned how great our country was because of the "checks and balances". Think back about what our government is really supposed to do for us. Then take 30 minutes out of your life and listen to some Ron Paul info on Youtube or google.
Hot Seat: Is Huckabee Too Funny? {Politics Daily}
Dec 19th 2007 11:58AM In response to Shrtnsweet-----
When you get a chance look up when the words "In God We Trust was added to currency. We are a religously "Free" society. That means everyone- no matter what or who they believe or don't believe in.
You can like his Christian values but please don't tell me you want to impose a Theocracy.
