Recent Comments:
Lexus Unveils Performance Models in Tokyo {Luxist}
Jan 20th 2011 4:23PM Dave Altwegg
You must get this LEXUS
Daniel Nava's Surreal Road to Red Sox {Fanhouse MLB Blog}
Jun 26th 2010 3:12PM Your doing a very excellent job. Keep it up
Ray Dubriske
McCain's Veep? {Politics Daily}
Feb 9th 2008 10:21AM rose winkler10
ROSE WINKLER YOU GOT IT RIGHT
Hillary Clinton's 35 Years of Experience? {Politics Daily}
Feb 4th 2008 11:47AM This story tells it as it is!!!!!!!
OF COURSE OBAMA IS GAINING since the media is doing everything in it's power to elect him. You remember, the same media that rubber-stamped the Bush-Cheney disaster into office.
THE DENVER POST ENDORSED HILLARY SUNDAY but the media is only reporting those who support Obama.
The media runs this story not to herald Sen. Clinton's vast experience but to question it, while yet to question Obama's extremely thin qualifications to run this nation.
WHEN THE MEDIA RUBBER-STAMPS CANDIDATES INTO OFFICE America ends up with Bush-Cheney disasters, and the media pretends it had nothing to do with it; then they do it again.
Obama More Likely to Beat McCain {News Bloggers}
Feb 2nd 2008 8:40PM your statement made in your article is completely un-true and you should correct by telling the true facts
The statement--"accuse Sen. Clinton of being just as complicit in the drive to war because she also voted for the resolution that authorized the Iraq War."
She did not vote to authorize the Iraq WAr.
Though Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton would score easy points against McCain on this count, Obama has an advantage here. Sen. McCain can turn around and accuse Sen. Clinton of being just as complicit in the drive to war because she also voted for the resolution that authorized the Iraq War. Whereas, Obama can say McCain showed poor judgment in going into Iraq in the first place and McCain has no defense to that. He could argue that the Iraq War has gone great, and I hope he does. Good luck with that strategy.
""The statement below is not accurate""
Why would Democrats want to neutralize this obvious advantage they have by picking a candidate that also voted for the war?
Something must be done to permit those being damaged by the comments in these reponses to be charged with libel etc
Obama More Likely to Beat McCain {News Bloggers}
Feb 2nd 2008 5:40PM “Hillary has been questioned x times and each time provided rationale for voting on the resolution to the United Nations. Unfounded and false assumptions has become the “folly” of many, to use their false judgments that she voted for the war only to to promote their own cause and cast a doubt on HIllarys judgment ability
Rest assured, her judgment ability will be used, as it has been skillfully used in the past, to compete with the Republican candidate; and there after guide our country in a sensible life saving and a least destructive plan for settling the condition in Iraq. “
You should be ashamed of providing a false picture of her message--You just cant accept the truth.
Obama More Likely to Beat McCain {News Bloggers}
Feb 2nd 2008 5:22PM “Hillary haS been questioned x times and each time provided rationale for voting on the resolution to the United Nations. Unfounded and false assumptions has become the “folly” of many, to use their false judgments that SHE voted for the war ONLY TO to promote their OWN cause and cast a doubt on HER judgment ability
Rest assured, HER judgment ability will be used, as it has been skillfully used in the past, to compete with the Republican candidate; and there after guide our country in a sensible life saving and a least destructive plan for settling the condition in Iraq. “
Stop using these false accumptions to support your falses premises to denigrate the best Democarat candidate
Hillary Goes Back on Her Word {Politics Daily}
Jan 31st 2008 12:11PM Couldn.t Agree more!!!!!
They will rue the day !!
Don't let them succeed
Envy will destroy them!!!!
"Sen. Ted Kennedy’s endorsement of Barack Obama for the Democratic presidential nomination should come as no surprise. Kennedy is a member in the so-called “Gang of Four” Hillary Clinton haters.
The Four — Kennedy, John Kerry, Howard Dean, and Al Gore — have pledged to stop Hillary from getting the nomination, and each has his own reason for detesting Clinton"
Unfortunately four unsuccessfull has-beens
Kennedy Endorsement Signals Shift {Politics Daily}
Jan 28th 2008 8:42PM This information was placed in an innocuous spot in the article:
How biased can you be:
To be fair, however, three of Bobby Kennedy's 9 surviving children have endorsed Hillary
Kennedy Endorsement Signals Shift {Politics Daily}
Jan 28th 2008 8:37PM My sentiments:
Everyone is saying the same thing Bill Clinton is saying in a different way and it is ok. Senator Clyburne said it is racist...then he proceeds to say "this is the first time the blacks had the chance to vote, a 104 year old lady said thanks the lord because she got to vote for a black candidate" what is that? You twist Bill Clinton's words. He did not say so what? The other black guys won that state. I am getting sick of the media people. You keep trying to change peoples minds about Bill Clinton. I would vote for a clinton every four years until I died!!! And I know many people that feel the same way. Keep trying. It isn't working
