Jan 30th 2010 6:02PM Isn't it interesting to think of how it really feels to sit on a stage and watch as the opposition chews up your arguments, exposes your personalities, and accurately and effectively refutes your talking points.
Now, check this out...somebody on that stage will sign his name to the invoice for payment. THEY ACTUALLY PAID to take that butt-whipin.
Jan 30th 2010 5:27PM Keep 'Rockin' Harold,
It is good to see the truth told in such a cogent manner.
Jan 30th 2010 5:08PM Oh, so as long as the President is quiet, like a good lil boy, and allows the RIGHT to run wild with lies, innuendo and complete anarchy, all is fine.
The comment to which I am responding seems like an admission that the GOP made a grievous error in inviting the President to speak and filed questions.
Jan 29th 2010 1:05PM EXCERPT for above...
Palin took up the issue on her Facebook page, writing that NOW is "looking at the pro-life issue backwards. Women should be reminded that they are strong enough and smart enough to make decisions that allow for career and educational opportunities while still giving their babies a chance at life."
Someone needs to tell Palin that she needs a communications advisor. How could she take the perspective that she took on this issue? How can she sit and carve-out responses the suit her interest in saying the minds of the less than thoughtful? How can she garner so much attention while operating at the very basic (lowest) level of mental acuity without foraying into what normal people call the ability to properly reason through an issue?
On the other hand, why bother with deep thought or open-mindedness with other perspectives when your base (of support) provides opportunity to make millions of dollars vai shallowness?
The nation would be much better off ignoring Palin and simply moving forward. Her attempt at authoritarian influence on NOW's position is only an issue because the media thrives on her shallow minded utterances.
Jan 27th 2010 7:42PM Oh look a typo TROLL. so, who is that is attempting to appear 'cute". You cannot come across as an intelligent person if you depict a typo and attempt to secure any sort of debate leverage. Freduian? Try typo. But then you know that but that FACT does not fit your effort at stand up comedy.
FACTS. BECK's Board,( since you captured that part of the comment to make your cute remark)...tell me if you felt it was factual in his comments related to use of the word Oligarchy. Tell me if you feel that Hannity's misuse of the video TWICE WITHIN 2 WEEKS was not a factual statement.
If you aim to debate or joust on the basis of facts, you should not corner yourself with FOX NEWS.
Tell me if you believe that FOX's past admitted use of GOP press releases as NEWS stories falls into the realm of fact. In fact, I believe that Murdock or on of his henchmen declare the practice as not acceptable.
Tell me if you thought that the young producer who staged 'excitement' at at TEA BAGGER rally just before a camera shot was a factual representation of news.
Let's reach back a bit. Tell me if you believed E.D. Hill's "terrorist handshake' debacle as factual. Remember she admitted a day later that she go that misrepresentation from the INTERNET.
Finally tell me two things....did you really think your attempt to discredit via a typo was 'cute' and did you vote for G. Bush twice...I suspect you did. If so, you should work as a promoter for the WWE.
Jan 27th 2010 1:34PM Two perspectives.
If it were not for FOX NEWS (evening shows)penchant for entertainment vs real news, I would accept the results. Hannity has been busted twice in a two month period with fake video related to stories. Beck calls the President of the Untied States a racist and fills his little kiddie board with all sorts for error filled and trite info. O'Reilly, about as credible as the story of the Scorpion and the Frog. He claims to be an independent; a clear lie; speaks to credibility.
Also, Rush LimPPaugh is also very popular. Need I say more. The results speak to the quality of the survey pool or respondents. I read a comment above about the time for the calls. MIDDAY (TEA BAGGERS) who do not work....the typical LimPPaugh crowd.
Yeah, the results reflect the same as the results the show that millions love to watch the WWE.
Jan 27th 2010 9:50AM A poster here actually refers to O'Keefe and his team as FREEDOM FIGHTERS. That is the laugh of the year.
How can any sane human being condone Watergate type Break-ins for purposes of planting listening devices? As the conservatives in this nation go bonkers with mind-sets delivered buy people like Beck, Hannity and LimPPaugh? Ah, a worthy questions. Has Beck, Hannity or LimPPaugh called these criminals 'freedom fighters also? If freedom fighter sis the correct vernacular, then why was Nixon Impeached for obstructing the investigation of his WIRE-TAP TEAM?
Seems a bit audacious and authoritarian to me (Cheney =ish actually). Now what nations have seem past practices of such: Germany, The Soviet Union, China, North Korea and God knows how many South American countries. FREEDOM Fighters...how sad, really is the posters thought processes.
Jan 26th 2010 8:57PM Exert from above:
"James O'Keefe is a hero. However, it looks like he broke the law and now must wear those awful red (new orleans) jail jumpsuits. Poor dear. His father is a state attorney general so hopefully he won't be jailed for too long.
Keep up the great work, James, but keep it legal, Dearest!"
ANOHTER: "BRING IT ON"
Does the Right have any level of originating or cogent thought: BRING IT ON. One would think that G Bush buried that trite phrase a few years back...even he admitted its ridiculousness HERO? Man, am I proud that my heroes are not common criminals. But, then, I find BECK, HANNITY and O'Reilly comparable to this O'Keefe. so, I am outside my realm of understanding such a post to begin with.
OH, NOW THE FBI HAS PICKED UP A LISTENING DEVICE IN A CAR A FEW BLOCKS AWAY. COME on BACK WaterGate.... HERO?
Jan 22nd 2010 2:27PM Well, Bristol, you 'spread em', he filled em'....why not just rely on Mom who never bothered to teach you about contraceptives. A Mom who was so into herself and her Stone AGE ERA beliefs, that she could not even see that her daughter was turning into a physical rock. A Mom who allowed the 'semen' to live in the same home as the soon to be fertile eggs.....why not just lean on Mom? She is cleaning up on the backs of U.S. conservatives. If she shares some of her 'gifts' with you, the family shares in a kind of 'spreading the wealth' welfare system. Of course, The 'Baby Daddy' should be responsible for support of the kid but there is a problem with your following him around frothing at the mouth for a part of each penny he earns based on your 'spreading em'.
Jan 18th 2010 12:36PM Looks like the conservative trolls are hitting lots of votes. How phony and shameful..as if people do not know that it is possible to multi-vote as one wishes. What a shame, like children cheating on a test.