Feb 19th 2010 3:43PM Just to be clear Bentley is owned by VW not BMW and Rolls Royce is in fact owned by BMW so it would make no sence to call this a BMW. By the way I am sure neither BMW or VW will be calling their cars by any other name as I am quite sure they paid good money for those time honored trademarks and they would have to reduce the price not raise it.
Oct 2nd 2009 8:24AM Maybe Michael Jordan is a Republican or one of the growing disappointed Democrats or maybe he just doesnt like Oprah and her prize posessions the Obamas, I could understand that. I think the President and Michael have alot in common both are self serving and both are bought and paid for with the almighty dollar. If thay wanted him so bad all they had to do is pay him. Rest assured the Obamas and Oprah certainly have their own agendas.
Dec 8th 2008 10:43AM Typical BS from another person trying to start a racial thing where it doesn't exist. This guy is a loser who tortured dogs and killed them and you don't need to be a member of PETA to know that is wrong. Perhaps if it was your dog or better yet you then you could begin to grasp why he belongs in jail and pennyless. He will be back alright but who really cares except some moron who thinks Mike Vick is still somehow a superstar.
Nov 25th 2008 9:40AM Watched the interview and no attack actually quite the contrary. Bill has just added to her fame and gave her quite a compliment. Tommy Christopher should watch the video before blogging it, he is really quite stupid or at least ignorant and I am not even a fan of Bill O'Rielly. Typical uninformed AOL BS.
Nov 16th 2008 9:00PM Everybody knows that gender is always considered but nobody want's to admit it. If anything it has gotten so politically correct that lesser qualified women will be in line first to avoid the idea that it may have been sexist. I believe whoever is more qualified is who should be considered but I don't believe it will be that way.
Nov 15th 2008 10:33AM This is the law: Under the new law, anyone with droopy pants that show skin or underwear faces legal action. The first offense carries a $150 fine or community service. A second infraction carries a $300 fine or more community service.
It is also known as indecent exposure, this is not about fashion it is about exposing your body or underwear in public and although I agree we should not need a law for something so obvious I don't want to see this in public. Where is the respect, where is the common decency? How much low life criminal activity is acceptable? How about a President that supports morals? This law is just a facet of an already existing law for indecent exposure and I for one agree with it. Keep you pants on in public. What you do indoors is your business.
Oct 23rd 2008 5:28PM Yes, McCain exprience is more important and what a stupid idea that having experience is somehow a disadvantage. And by the way David Know"less" AOL says McCain is closing the gap and only a couple points less in the polls so you may want to read your own company's blogs.
Sep 3rd 2008 5:05PM Steve, I believe in truth I just don't believe Obama or McCain or any other politician is truthful. We are doomed either way but Obama will leave the back door open for the terrorists and I would rather have a bit more time being free.
Sep 3rd 2008 4:56PM Steve, Please vote who you like but you can keep the change, Obama has less experience than Palin and he is running for President now that scares me more. I don't want change so bad that I am willing to give up being an American and Obama is not exactly a Patriot.
Jun 19th 2008 8:16PM You can not say that it is not okay for McCain to change his view on off shore drilling and then excuse Obama for changing his views regarding funding. This is a two way street so either you accept both or reject both otherwise you are a hipocrit. And most of you are as I see it.