Patricia Kluge: Billionaire's Ex-Wife Faces Foreclosure

Patricia Kluge, the 1980s society queen and ex-wife of billionaire media mogul John Kluge, has fallen on some hard times. Kluge was famously awarded the largest divorce settlement in history (a reported $1.6 million a week) but she seems to have figured out a way to spend it – and then some.
She's allegedly in default of nearly $23 million on her gilded mansion in Virginia, which made headlines for its outlandish $100 million price tag when it first hit the market in October 2009. Sotheby's didn't get that asking price, nor the drastically reduced $24 million it was eventually priced at. Instead, on Feb. 16, the 23,538-square-foot home will be auctioned on the Albemarle County courthouse steps.
Kluge's house isn't the only possession she's losing: Her antiques and jewelry have already been auctioned through Sotheby's. Her winery was foreclosed on and its inventory also sold off at auction. On top of that, several lots in the Vineyard Estates subdivision she devised for her property were also auctioned.
The Hook reported that according to court records, Kluge borrowed a whopping $66 million for the house, winery and subdivision.
How could Kluge have blown through her fortune and now lost it all?
An Outsized Ambition
From the sound of it, ambition got the best of the nude-model-turned-landed-gentry.
Kluge entered the Virginia wine industry in 1999, flush with cash and an outspoken desire to be the most prestigious winery on the East Coast. That kind of hubris irritated the rest of the Virginia wineries who aimed to promote the state's wines as a whole. Kluge wasn't looking for friends; instead she pumped a reported $50 million into developing the winery. Of that, $27 million was said to be spent on state-of-the-art equipment alone. In comparison, a source at one well-regarded winery down the road says they haven't spent that much in their 30-plus-year history.
Kluge spared no expense. She also lured renowned consultants and a winemaker from France whose salary was rumored to be $1 million. And while most Virginia wineries produce about 5,000 cases a year, Kluge tried to bottle 50,000 to 60,000 cases. But those in the wine industry say her unrealistic timeline is most likely where Kluge went wrong.
As one insider puts it, "The old saying goes: 'how do you make a small fortune in wine? You start with a big one.' But you can't spend like a drunken sailor because it's already expensive.
"You plant three years before you get useable fruit...it takes a decade just to figure out what you're doing," the source says. "The problem wasn't with the grapes or the winemaking, it was bad business."
Interestingly, Kluge's wines were well received. Kluge Estates was a regular winner in the state's Governor's Cup wine awards. But one of her many business missteps was in her pricing. The Kluge Estates New World Red, a Bordeaux-style red blend, was originally priced at $75 a bottle. That's steep for Virginia wine, no matter how good it is.
Bob Kocher, owner of Once Upon a Vine wine shops in Richmond, Va., sells more Virginia wine than any other retailer and is intimately familiar with the challenges of the industry. "The problem with Virginia wines is the first thing they build is a huge, beautiful tasting room that costs a million-and-a-half and they want you to pay for it by charging a high price for their wine. Napa started in barns, they didn't start in tasting rooms. [Kluge Estates] was trying to make a fast dime when they should have made a slow nickel."
The price of the New World Red was reduced several times until it ultimately went for $22 a bottle.
"I don't think she was a person that really knew the wine industry in general and I think she just went overboard telling people she would go global before even she went Virginia-wide," Kocher says. "I think she just overspent."

The Beginning of the End
The winery's debts piled up and Kluge did what she could to save it. She took out multiple mortgages on Albemarle House (above), the home she built with ex-husband Kluge and had lavishly decorated with rare antiques from around the world. In a January 2010 interview, Kluge told Luxist that she and third husband, William Moses, were looking to downsize. What she didn't mention was the true dire financial straits she was in.
A month later the price of Albemarle House was chopped in half, to $48 million. By April, Sotheby's announced it would be auctioning the contents of the estate in its first home auction in 20 years. The auction, which included a $3.8 million Imperial Chinese clock and custom $300,000 sporting guns, was estimated to bring in $14 million. The resulting sale exceeded that, earning $15.2 million. Next on the auction block was Kluge's jewelry. In late April 2010, Sotheby's auctioned her personal jewelry collection, a sure sign of the coming apocalypse for Kluge. That sale earned $5 million.
All was quiet on the Kluge front for the next six months while Kluge struggled to stave off creditors. Until October, when Kluge Estate Winery was hit with foreclosure. Last month the 960-acre winery and vineyards were auctioned but failed to sell when no one stepped up to top lender, Farm Credit, and its $19 million bid. So for now the winery stays in the hands of Farm Credit. Bill Shmidheiser, a lawyer with Farm Credit, said the bank hopes to sell the property and that $19 million is a good deal for any buyer considering the $50 million Kluge and Moses spent creating the winery.
Most recently the winery's inventory was sold at auction. Due to Virginia alcohol laws, only licensed sellers were able to attend. Much to the dismay of the state's wine industry the wine sold at bargain-basement prices and even had to be stopped after one case sold for just $2. A Virginia wine insider says that upset the other wineries who are now expecting a flood of inexpensive Kluge wines to hit the market, devaluing their wines. "It makes us all look amateurish."
The most recent foreclosure to wallop Kluge is that of her Vineyard Estates subdivision. Much to the displeasure of the rest of tony Albemarle County -- which is filled with multi-acre plantations including Thomas Jefferson's Monticello -- Kluge launched a plan to subdivide a portion of her 300 acres into the luxury "Vineyard Estates." The development would offer plots from $1.5 to $13 million and offer a selection of pre-screened architectural plans as well as a "global concierge" service.
Five lots in the 24-lot subdivision -- it's first phase -- went into foreclosure when the partner on the deal, First Colony Corporation from North Carolina, went bankrupt. The subdivision's 122 acres are assessed at $6.9 million and Vineyard Estates LLC owes $8.2 million, according to a property auction notice. Only one house was built in the subdivision as a spec house. In an interesting twist, Kluge and Moses bought that house back at the foreclosure auction: They were its only bidders. The home, Glen Love Cottage, is 6,600 square feet and assessed at $2.76 million. They paid $3.675 and currently live there.
"Vineyard Estates has suffered from a lack of sales as have many other real estate projects during the recent economic downturn," Bill Moses said in a statement.
The Final Straw
In an interview with The Hook, Moses outlined the fall of the winery. Apparently in 2008 an equity investor was lined up to partner with the winery when, on the eve of the banking collapse, Farm Credit called in its $34.8 million loan. Moses says it was a non-monetary default. The winery had simply not met its 2007 sales projections. Kluge and Moses' outsized ambitions had gotten the best of them.
"There was no way we could immediately repay the loan," Moses told The Hook. "We had over-leveraged the company."
And while they tried for a year-and-a-half to desperately to save the company -- negotiating with the bank and selling their belongings -- it still wasn't enough. In the end, Moses said, "it was like swimming laps with lead weights."
Carrie Culpepper blogs about design and travel at CultureFix.wordpress.com.
Forbidden America: Cold War-Era Map Shows No-Go Zones For Soviet Tourists
Chili's Waitress Fired Over Facebook Post Insulting 'Stupid Cops'
Tenants: Stench of Death Makes St. Louis Complex 'Unlivable'
Man Takes Dump In Background Of Instructional Workout Video
Ricardo Cerezo, Facing Eviction, Finds $4.85 Million Lottery Ticket
2013 Billboard Music Awards: Arrivals Photos From the Blue Carpet!
MIT's cheetah robot runs faster, more efficiently, can carry its own power supply (video)
Forever 21 Worker Fired After She Tells Her Traumatic Story
Taylor Swift Q and A: What Does She Splurge on in Las Vegas?
Billboard Music Awards: Worst Dressed (or Most Daring?) From Past Red Carpets
Reader Comments (Page 2 of 20)
dragonlady Jan 25th 2011 9:08PM
I guess she at least learned to put her clothes on; having once been a nude "model".
JLS Jan 21st 2011 10:39PM
Extremely interesting story to follow. VERY well written article. What a path this has taken. To me, she squandered a substantial fortune through bad business advice and decisions. Perhaps husband no. 3 is pivotal in what took place.
A very sad story indeed. To have it and then it's poof gone-well, that's tragic.
New York Jan 25th 2011 11:12AM
She really doesn't too broken up about it.
missmk630 Jan 25th 2011 11:34AM
I agree with you. Ill begotten good? Easy come easy go !!!
edgebysuccess Jan 25th 2011 11:36AM
if its so tragic, JLS, send her a check!
she'll latch onto another rich husband and divorce him. they always do. what's your net worth like?
ranchodelavilla Jan 25th 2011 12:16PM
Hardly tragic. She is not even working class. Tragic is children in America living in poverty, growing up in gangs, and in vast trailer park, or ratty apartment ghettos. The rich know that money doesn't buy happiness, what they don't know is how much poverty shapes who one becomes.
Bahmeh Jan 25th 2011 1:04PM
It's just another case of too much ambition, not enough wisdom & a lack of proper planning. It could have been a great winery (andd still can be) but she lacks patience. She set her expectations simply too high and her spending outstripped her level of wealth. Hopefully the property will be bought up by someone with a better business sense than she was gifted (or cursed) with.
gjsly Jan 25th 2011 1:06PM
No, not tragic! Just plain stupid!
E. Martinez Jan 25th 2011 3:40PM
Yes JLS, she did lose all of her cash and belongs due to her bad business choices however, if you let the right-wingers tell the "story", it's all the Presidents fault. LOL I just love how they can take a story such as this and then turn into a b*tch feast about someone who had NO HAND in her decision making?? I get such a chuckle from it. Thanks guys. Thanks for my chuckle of the day. (Yep, still LMAO) One thing I know for certain... I can ALWAYS count on you guys!! :D
BTW, What a jewelry collection!! I'm envious of the lady who now owns the Yellow Diamond pieces. Now I wouldn't pay that kind of money, even if I were rich but hey, to each her own... right? ;D
ccyancey21 Jan 25th 2011 3:53PM
JLS - you and I have a completely different understanding of the definition of the word 'tragic'. I think the word you are searching for is 'stupid', or perhaps 'moronic', maybe even 'imbecilic', but certainly not tragic.
She and her husband still live in a $3+ million home. Tragic is a homeless shelter full of single moms and kids trying not to starve and/or freeze to death. Tragic is a family losing everything because the sole supporter passed away suddenly and they were without life insurance.
Please consult your dictionary.
JONZIE Jan 25th 2011 4:08PM
i agree it is sad.........poor managment and lack of people to guide her in the correct way.......to make fun of her is very petty
GPR Jan 22nd 2011 12:18AM
A divergence for this site, but one of the better written articles here.
batsugan Jan 25th 2011 1:13PM
"Five lots in the 24-lot subdivision -- it's first phase--..."
"It's?" "IT'S?!" It never fails to astonish me that people like Ms. Culpepper are paid to be "journalists." Please, learn the difference between "it's" and "its." Geez, no wonder this country's in trouble.
This was almost one of the better written articles.
rzman11 Jan 22nd 2011 12:59AM
who's shocked here? She didn't earn the money in the first place, just another sad divorcee with crazy laws in her favor. Maybe she should ask her educated, successful, ex to help her out. (For a fee, of course!) Learn what it takes to earn a buck, then it won't be so easy to burn through them...
JLS Jan 22nd 2011 2:38AM
When you marry you contribute to the success of your partner. I've been married for 41 years and can verify that quite well. You don't live as single people do-you share wealth and should. You also share bad health, grief and failure. It's a well rounded life together, not individually.
I just spent a long while researching both Pat and John Kluge. They were married for 9 years it seems. Take into consideration what 1.6 million a week is from a man who is worth - at the time they divorced - 5.2 BILLION dollars. It's nothing unless you are looking at it from your own financial perspective in life.
Judgment requires perspective and most times it's eclipsed by substantial jealousy of that amount of money.
And finally, neither Pat nor John have the best character and have led the most respectable lives. They were both married to others when they met and cheated on their spouses to hook up together.
Questionable types with money to burn.
JLS Jan 22nd 2011 2:56AM
One last thing. Patricia is on the board for New York University. She's educated in her own rite.
What actually went wrong here is hers to know but this 62 year old woman is not stupid nor does she lack accomplishments.
Colleen Jan 25th 2011 10:56AM
Exactly--she didn't earn any of the money she had. She got the money in a divorce settlement. She was a nude model. She should have taken that money and lived a nice and comfortable life. She wanted more... Imagine!
yokoach Jan 25th 2011 11:19AM
yes....in this case it wasn't the wife 'contributing to the success of the man'. this guy made his business starting in the 60's and sold it in 1986 a mere 5 years after he was married to this gold digger. One doesn't have a business for 20+ years and then all of a sudden a wife comes along and it's worth billions, he was a german immigrant who worked his butt off for it and she basically raped him for $1.6 million a week...she was married for 9 years but he sold his biz after only 5 years of their marriage...someone please, oh please justify what she could have done in those 5 years that made her worth 1.6 million per week. I'd like to hear something that had some real logic in the justification not just some romantic drivel about how she contributed to her him by her 'love' for him.
I'm a fan of the notion that when people ARE partners in a relationship that there is the kind of participation in each other's lives that contributes to the financial success of the partnership but 5 years??? after 20+ years of work? nope, i don't get it.
so no wonder she crashed, she and her new husband who thought they knew so much about managing and making money...apparently John was the one who knew about how to handle money, she only knew how to spend it.
JONZIE Jan 25th 2011 4:10PM
haha, sounds like a few angry men who have gone through a divorce......laws are laws.............she deserves every penny
chad.dawkins Jan 22nd 2011 3:57AM
Question JLS, how much was the guy worth before he married her? Unless he made $6 billion in 9 years(and she wasn't even his first wife) then she probably didn't have much of anything to do with it.