<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Luxist - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.luxist.com/2010/10/27/glenfyne-single-malt-expected-to-fetch-10-000/</link>
<description>Luxist Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2013 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2010/10/27/glenfyne-single-malt-expected-to-fetch-10-000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2010/10/27/glenfyne-single-malt-expected-to-fetch-10-000/</guid><description><![CDATA[If Federal Law Prohibits the Sale and Re-Use of This Bottle, then how is it being allowed that it can be sold and used now? Just because it's old? Just because it will fetch nearly $20,000 American Dollars? I'm confused why it can sold and re-used now, when Federal Law Prohibits it!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ashleigh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 28th 2010 9:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2010/10/27/glenfyne-single-malt-expected-to-fetch-10-000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2010/10/27/glenfyne-single-malt-expected-to-fetch-10-000/</guid><description><![CDATA[The stamp means that you cannot sell the EMPTY bottle. Its perfectly legal to sell the bottle with the contents intact.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ladyshooter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 28th 2010 9:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2010/10/27/glenfyne-single-malt-expected-to-fetch-10-000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2010/10/27/glenfyne-single-malt-expected-to-fetch-10-000/</guid><description><![CDATA[This article isn't about Beer! It's about WHISKEY!!!  But either way, I prefer wine, too! :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ashleigh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 28th 2010 9:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2010/10/27/glenfyne-single-malt-expected-to-fetch-10-000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2010/10/27/glenfyne-single-malt-expected-to-fetch-10-000/</guid><description><![CDATA[Crack the seal and pour me a double.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ernest]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 29th 2010 12:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2010/10/27/glenfyne-single-malt-expected-to-fetch-10-000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2010/10/27/glenfyne-single-malt-expected-to-fetch-10-000/</guid><description><![CDATA[Great merciful heavens, I had just prepared my palate for Macallan's $10,550.00 booze, but now I find that there is probably more snob appeal involved with swilling Glenfyne at considerably more! What is an obscenely rich Scotch dipso to do?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[wboozer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 30th 2010 8:37PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>