<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Luxist - Comments for World's Seventh Largest Yacht Raided in Prostitution Bust, Trump Associate Arrested</title>
<link>http://www.luxist.com/2010/10/01/worlds-seventh-largest-yacht-raided-in-prostitution-bust-trump/</link>
<description>Luxist Comments for World's Seventh Largest Yacht Raided in Prostitution Bust, Trump Associate Arrested</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2013 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on World's Seventh Largest Yacht Raided in Prostitution Bust, Trump Associate Arrested]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2010/10/01/worlds-seventh-largest-yacht-raided-in-prostitution-bust-trump/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2010/10/01/worlds-seventh-largest-yacht-raided-in-prostitution-bust-trump/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm no fan of Trump but he clearly had nothing to do with this little non-event and should not have been mentioned. Perhaps if this story needs to be printed it should in a tabloid such as the Daily Mail. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rwayne52]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 1st 2010 8:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on World's Seventh Largest Yacht Raided in Prostitution Bust, Trump Associate Arrested]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2010/10/01/worlds-seventh-largest-yacht-raided-in-prostitution-bust-trump/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2010/10/01/worlds-seventh-largest-yacht-raided-in-prostitution-bust-trump/</guid><description><![CDATA[You're right about Trump, at least from the perspective that there is no indication he is involved in any way in this business.<br><br>However, if you choose to be a celebrity, you have to accept the trash along with the fame.<br><br>As long as they don't accuse Trump of anything in the article, it ain't libel.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[reallytorkedoff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 1st 2010 11:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on World's Seventh Largest Yacht Raided in Prostitution Bust, Trump Associate Arrested]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2010/10/01/worlds-seventh-largest-yacht-raided-in-prostitution-bust-trump/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2010/10/01/worlds-seventh-largest-yacht-raided-in-prostitution-bust-trump/</guid><description><![CDATA[There are journalism standards of ethics higher then libel and this article does not meet those standards.<br><br>The author was just able to string together  yacht, prostitution and Trump. He took the low road.. <br> ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rwayne52]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 2nd 2010 8:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on World's Seventh Largest Yacht Raided in Prostitution Bust, Trump Associate Arrested]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2010/10/01/worlds-seventh-largest-yacht-raided-in-prostitution-bust-trump/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2010/10/01/worlds-seventh-largest-yacht-raided-in-prostitution-bust-trump/</guid><description><![CDATA[True, but there is some merit to establishing the main figure's relationship to people the reader may be more familiar with.<br><br>It allows a more familiar frame of reference.<br><br>And the author didn't accuse Trump of anything, or for that matter, other celebrity visitors to the yacht, who were also not implicated by authorities or the writer.<br><br>Without the various references, the article is about largely unfamiliar people and the comments would run more to the "who cares about these nobodies" variety.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[reallytorkedoff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 2nd 2010 5:06PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>