The Fashion Statement: Luxury in Flux

You can blame plenty of things on the recession, but luxury fashion may never be the same.
Houses are way past worrying whether the haute couture segment of their business will live or die. Now the industry is lowering the prices of their ready-to-wear collections, investing more in cheaper secondary lines and producing small collections for cheap chic retailers like H&M. More people probably know Zac Posen from his capsule line for Target than for his self-named ready-to-wear collection that hangs at Saks or Neiman Marcus.
Is this the end of luxury-largely defined by exclusivity-as we know it?
The house of Valentino caused a dust up at a Reuters Global Luxury Summit late last week. Never having sold an evening gown for less than 2,000 euros, Valentino is offering cocktail dresses for half that and T-shirts priced at about $300. The main question at the summit: How can Valentino be more accessible without losing its luxury appeal?
"Being more affordable means you are trying to get new customers on board," Valentino's CEO Stefano Sassi told the summit. "We are not stretching down the brand. We are trying to say that you can be both couture and contemporary."
Designers are also willingly downgrading themselves. Last week, Olivier Theyskens, the high-end Belgian designer was tapped to design the moderately priced fashion label Theory. Theyskens said he had long been bothered by the fact that his haute designs were unapproachable to his own generation.
In the last few weeks, another sign of change is in the wind. Gone are the days of hiring superstar designers to helm established European houses. Among the changes: Hermès is replacing Jean Paul Gaultier with the largely unknown Christophe Lemaire. Emanuel Ungaro did away with Lindsay Lohan (thank goodness!) and is banking on designer Giles Deacon. Sarah Burton is in at Alexander McQueen. And Alessandro Dell'Acqua will design Brioni's women's line. As a sign of things to come, perhaps, Valentino Gharavani retired in 2008 (his last collection pictured above) and hired Maria Grazia Chiuri and Pier Paolo Piccioli, two low-key accessory designers from within his company, to take over the collections.
'Undercover Boss': Top 4 Moments From Season 4 [VIDEO]
Las Vegas Court Officials Accused Of Covering Up Sex Assault [VIDEO]
Walmart vs. Costco: How Do They Really Compare?
Groomers Lose Dog, Claim Not Responsible
Oklahoma man allowed to sue state over native american rain god on license plate
The Story Behind Shapewear: From Girdles to Spanx
'Grease' Cast: Where Are They Now?
Microsoft E3 2013 Xbox liveblog!
Living in a Van Was the Best Financial Decision I Ever Made
7 Myths of Long-Term Care
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Mitch Jun 11th 2010 9:11AM
It's not entirely a bad thing that prices for beautiful clothing are going down. To it simply means that more people will be able to afford dressing beautifully!
Mitch Jun 11th 2010 9:19AM
To me, it's not entirely a bad thing that prices for beautiful clothing are going down. It simply means that more people will be able to afford dressing beautifully!
Jackie O Jun 11th 2010 5:20PM
I'll never be able to afford a haute couture item. Hell I couldn't even aford to buy a silly T-shirt. "Valentino is offering cocktail dresses for half that and T-shirts priced at about $300." OMG .. I love beautiful clothes but really a T-shirt that costs $300, what is wrong with this picture?
Ms.KnowItAll Jun 11th 2010 5:36PM
wah, wah, wah... maybe you shouldn't be charging more than a year's rent for f'ing dress???
engrave11 Jun 11th 2010 6:44PM
Oh yes this is a universal devastation... all you have is a bunch of fruits tippy-toeing around saying oh my god...