<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Luxist - Comments for Unsmoked Churchill Cigar Fetches Thousands</title>
<link>http://www.luxist.com/2010/06/04/unsmoked-churchill-cigar-fetches-thousands/</link>
<description>Luxist Comments for Unsmoked Churchill Cigar Fetches Thousands</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2013 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Unsmoked Churchill Cigar Fetches Thousands]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2010/06/04/unsmoked-churchill-cigar-fetches-thousands/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2010/06/04/unsmoked-churchill-cigar-fetches-thousands/</guid><description><![CDATA[You should mention that the cigar was a Camacho. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gianni]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 5th 2010 3:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Unsmoked Churchill Cigar Fetches Thousands]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2010/06/04/unsmoked-churchill-cigar-fetches-thousands/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2010/06/04/unsmoked-churchill-cigar-fetches-thousands/</guid><description><![CDATA[Isnt the picture of a camacho cigar? Same band.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fred]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2010 7:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Unsmoked Churchill Cigar Fetches Thousands]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2010/06/04/unsmoked-churchill-cigar-fetches-thousands/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2010/06/04/unsmoked-churchill-cigar-fetches-thousands/</guid><description><![CDATA[One of the facts is wrong here, and my bet is that it's the picture. While Camacho was founded in the 1960s (so the 1963 date may be possible), they never produced cigars in Cuba (and that looks like a post 2004 band in the pic). I have enough faith in Christie's to believe they did their homework, so ihave to assume that either the picture is wrong (and the cigar was not a Camacho) or the description here is wrong and the cigar was not Cuban. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 8th 2010 8:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Unsmoked Churchill Cigar Fetches Thousands]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2010/06/04/unsmoked-churchill-cigar-fetches-thousands/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2010/06/04/unsmoked-churchill-cigar-fetches-thousands/</guid><description><![CDATA[I stand corrected. Camacho was indeed once a Cuban brand that was apparently discontinued at some point after the embargo. Camacho left Cuba in 1961 to begin the current incarnation of the company, but like many brands whose owners left after Castro took over, the Cuban version continued, at least for a little while. Very little information is readily available on the Cuban Camacho, but please accept my apology for incorrectly calling you out.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 9th 2010 11:25AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>