Piaget Emperador Temple Diamonds Watch - $3.5 Million

So much jewelery, so much.. watchery. The timepiece contains a variety of stone cuts. The watch has baguette cut stones, brilliant cut stones, and one emerald cut stone that tops off the stack o' precious gems. The watch case fits the Emperador style mold, and inside the watch is two movements. The grander of the two being the tourbillon. Not too sure whether the top movement is mechanical or quartz. The purpose of a watch like this? To show off. It brings new meaning to the concept of "pyramid power." At the very least, the heap of diamonds on your wrist will get you nice tables at restaurants and extra expensive drinks at the bar. Piaget made this watch as one-off piece that went for a price that was somewhere in the rage of $3.5 million. Though their doors and arms are wide open to you should you decide to fund a second model for your personal wearing pleasure.
Ariel Adams publishes the luxury watch review site aBlogtoRead.com.
Live from Microsoft's New Generation Xbox event!
Xbox Reveal liveblog on Joystiq
The List #0147: Escape a Car Underwater
Xbox One architecture panel liveblog!
H&M's Plus-Size Model Jennie Runk Says She Chose To Gain Weight
Dozens Killed in Oklahoma Tornado; Death Toll to Rise
Okla. Sheriff's Deputy Finds Dog Guarding Body Buried Under Destroyed Home
Okla. School Survivor: Teacher 'Saved Our Lives'
Reptiles Make Home in UK Man's Cable Box
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
al schrader Apr 21st 2010 8:14PM
Truly wealthy people don't wear a watch, they have someone to check the time for them. I don't wear a watch, I did however discover the particle that causes time of which this information is worth more than any diamonds....Alfred Schrader-
ADMR Apr 21st 2010 9:24PM
4 My Personal Wearing PLEASURE - ENVY ME.
babette Apr 21st 2010 9:42PM
What a disgusting piece of ostentation. $3.5 million is probably
more than the total net worth of many third world countries. And
how much good the money could do, with enough left over for a watch
in better taste than this.
meaghandawnm Apr 21st 2010 11:23PM
i must agree, i think it is hideous and ive seen so many nicer watches for under 100. Plus, if you have 3.5 million to spend on a watch.. cant you find something more productive to do with it? Like feed a starving community for 6 months.
Diksha Apr 22nd 2010 2:02AM
Airwatches site where we find invicata ,wenger swiss watch..
Invicta Midsize watches
vek Apr 22nd 2010 4:17AM
I cannot believe the errors in this article! 'Inside the watch IS two movements'? How about 'ARE two movements'?! 'Piaget is able to FITS'? 'Somewhere in the RAGE'? Find a job where you don't need to write, please, Ariel Adams....
Lara Apr 22nd 2010 4:05PM
I thought we'd gotten past these hideous displays of hedonism, but apparently not.