<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Luxist - Comments for New Rolex Explorer Watch For 2010</title>
<link>http://www.luxist.com/2010/03/18/new-rolex-explorer-watch-for-2010/</link>
<description>Luxist Comments for New Rolex Explorer Watch For 2010</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on New Rolex Explorer Watch For 2010]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2010/03/18/new-rolex-explorer-watch-for-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2010/03/18/new-rolex-explorer-watch-for-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA[TTTT, doesn't this Rolex look the same as the older one's...? Really wish they could come up with something more innovative. I guess this does go back to how Rolex still needing to keep its brand 'old school', and classy. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shawn Ames]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 22nd 2010 4:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on New Rolex Explorer Watch For 2010]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2010/03/18/new-rolex-explorer-watch-for-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2010/03/18/new-rolex-explorer-watch-for-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA[The problem with the (prior to 2010) explorer is that it was so much smaller than any other men's watches.  It was a good watch for a prep-school tweener, or a woman, but not so masculine for a guy.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 24th 2010 10:44PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
