Chris Webber Sued Over Restaurant Closure
Last November we mentioned that former Sacramento Kings basketball star Chris Webber had closed down Center Court With C-Webb, the sports restaurant he opened in the Sacramento three years ago. At the time of the closure there was talk that there might be a new location in the future but that never materialized. Now the AP is reporting that the owner of the shopping center where the restaurant was located is suing Webber and his business partner. Webber and his partner had signed a 20-year lease back in 2005. Promenade, the company that owns the Promenade at Sacramento Gateway Shopping Center, wants around $3 million to satisfy overdue rent as well as pay for cleanup costs and other fees and get the property ready for re-leasing. Webber and his partner, Jeff Dudum of Dudum Sports and Entertainment are disputing the length of the lease which was reportedly signed with the shopping center's former owner, Opus West Corp., which is now bankrupt.
In October 2009, Sacramento police arrested a man in connection with a fatal shooting outside the restaurant. The restaurant served sandwiches, steak and a variety of burgers including the "Fab 5," a burger with 44 ounces of choice Angus beef which sold for $29.50.
Mary Kincaid: Weekly Roundup of eBay Vintage Home Finds (PHOTOS)
First Woman To Command A Warship In Royal Navy History
'American Idol' Changes Record Contract Policy: Runner-Up No Longer Guaranteed Major Bucks
America's 10 Highest-Paid CEOs of 2011 (and How They Earned It)
The Richest Woman in the World: How Gina Rinehart Earns her Billions
What Happened When Alex Kenjeev Paid His Student Loan in Cash
Samsung Galaxy S III review
Carrie Underwood's Grunge Rock Past: 'I Was All About Pearl Jam'
Mary J. Blige, Charity Lawsuit: Singer's Foundation Sued for Failing to Repay $250K Loan
Hawkeye and the Blue Ear Help a Mother and Her Hearing Impaired Son
Country Star Yearbook Pics
Reader Comments (Page 2 of 2)
nthn Mar 3rd 2010 9:46PM
Legally the owner is entitled to the money Chris would have paid him over time - whether he can get the amount is doubtful.