<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Luxist - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.luxist.com/2010/01/25/the-worlds-ugliest-rolex-yours-for-46-000/</link>
<description>Luxist Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2010/01/25/the-worlds-ugliest-rolex-yours-for-46-000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2010/01/25/the-worlds-ugliest-rolex-yours-for-46-000/</guid><description><![CDATA[This POS is actually a few years old, this model is consider by many a POS and others a MoFo POS...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[hey dude7]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 25th 2010 2:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2010/01/25/the-worlds-ugliest-rolex-yours-for-46-000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2010/01/25/the-worlds-ugliest-rolex-yours-for-46-000/</guid><description><![CDATA[The rich aint like us.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wish Belkin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 27th 2010 12:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2010/01/25/the-worlds-ugliest-rolex-yours-for-46-000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2010/01/25/the-worlds-ugliest-rolex-yours-for-46-000/</guid><description><![CDATA[Looks like something a hooker would get at her retirement party.  THANKS FOR 50 YEARS OF GREAT SERVICE!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rudewaitress]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 27th 2010 2:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2010/01/25/the-worlds-ugliest-rolex-yours-for-46-000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2010/01/25/the-worlds-ugliest-rolex-yours-for-46-000/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow, it really is ugly.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rigel Celeste]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 25th 2010 3:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2010/01/25/the-worlds-ugliest-rolex-yours-for-46-000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2010/01/25/the-worlds-ugliest-rolex-yours-for-46-000/</guid><description><![CDATA[Did a rich pimp order it?  How did this abomination get built? Who's the present owner?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 25th 2010 3:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2010/01/25/the-worlds-ugliest-rolex-yours-for-46-000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2010/01/25/the-worlds-ugliest-rolex-yours-for-46-000/</guid><description><![CDATA[NO Thanks. Too Ugly for me....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jrmke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 25th 2010 4:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2010/01/25/the-worlds-ugliest-rolex-yours-for-46-000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2010/01/25/the-worlds-ugliest-rolex-yours-for-46-000/</guid><description><![CDATA[I like It...although apparently not EveryOnes Cup Of Tea - lol]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ADMR]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 7:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2010/01/25/the-worlds-ugliest-rolex-yours-for-46-000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2010/01/25/the-worlds-ugliest-rolex-yours-for-46-000/</guid><description><![CDATA[I must be different, because I absolutely love it. My favorite print is leopard or cheetah.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[toni_parker-johnson@comcast.net]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 25th 2010 9:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2010/01/25/the-worlds-ugliest-rolex-yours-for-46-000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2010/01/25/the-worlds-ugliest-rolex-yours-for-46-000/</guid><description><![CDATA[<br>I must be different, because I absolutely love it. My favorite print<br>is leopard or cheetah.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TPJ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 25th 2010 9:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2010/01/25/the-worlds-ugliest-rolex-yours-for-46-000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2010/01/25/the-worlds-ugliest-rolex-yours-for-46-000/</guid><description><![CDATA[totally agree.  i saw it and was like oh my gosh i love it!  it's actually the only rolex ive ever seen i would wear.  normally their so BORING. so this is a nice change.  lets hope there's more to come along this line.  because, let's face it, rolex as it is, is for rich middle age business men.  not entirely intriguing. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[arizscout]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 8:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2010/01/25/the-worlds-ugliest-rolex-yours-for-46-000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2010/01/25/the-worlds-ugliest-rolex-yours-for-46-000/</guid><description><![CDATA[Arizscout you are so right!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TPJ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 8:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2010/01/25/the-worlds-ugliest-rolex-yours-for-46-000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2010/01/25/the-worlds-ugliest-rolex-yours-for-46-000/</guid><description><![CDATA[i love it!!!!!!!!!!i have a lady president and i would love this one]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[lois tapp]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 29th 2010 8:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2010/01/25/the-worlds-ugliest-rolex-yours-for-46-000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2010/01/25/the-worlds-ugliest-rolex-yours-for-46-000/</guid><description><![CDATA[i think its ugly but its kinda cool that ppl have the skills to do that with a watch. our technology is awsome and alot of people dont realy grasp the endless possabilitys of modern day tech.! whats next a diamond leapord skin head band lol<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dom]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 4:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2010/01/25/the-worlds-ugliest-rolex-yours-for-46-000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2010/01/25/the-worlds-ugliest-rolex-yours-for-46-000/</guid><description><![CDATA[omfg that is one ugly timepiece ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[hello asca]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 4:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2010/01/25/the-worlds-ugliest-rolex-yours-for-46-000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2010/01/25/the-worlds-ugliest-rolex-yours-for-46-000/</guid><description><![CDATA[If it was 10 times bigger I'm sure Flava Flav would wear it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[snake plissken]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 4:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2010/01/25/the-worlds-ugliest-rolex-yours-for-46-000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2010/01/25/the-worlds-ugliest-rolex-yours-for-46-000/</guid><description><![CDATA[Good lord, Please take that away from my sight]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Pete]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 5:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2010/01/25/the-worlds-ugliest-rolex-yours-for-46-000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2010/01/25/the-worlds-ugliest-rolex-yours-for-46-000/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yikes...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ADMR]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 7:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2010/01/25/the-worlds-ugliest-rolex-yours-for-46-000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2010/01/25/the-worlds-ugliest-rolex-yours-for-46-000/</guid><description><![CDATA[Isn't it all about being noticed when you wear a Rolex??? I guess this would get noticed!!! BIG TIME!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[masroland64]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 5:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2010/01/25/the-worlds-ugliest-rolex-yours-for-46-000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2010/01/25/the-worlds-ugliest-rolex-yours-for-46-000/</guid><description><![CDATA[A stock Cosmo Daytona is 39k. This guy by the way the watch is priced probably put down 7k or more to get it this ugly. I'd buy it but probably only wear it at halloween.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian H]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 5:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2010/01/25/the-worlds-ugliest-rolex-yours-for-46-000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2010/01/25/the-worlds-ugliest-rolex-yours-for-46-000/</guid><description><![CDATA[<br>Wish I had the money.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kalvin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2010 5:21PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
