Rollins Mansion, Estate of the Day
It's hard to know what the fate will be of a grand old home like this. The Rollins Mansion in Des Moines, Iowa is an 82-year-old English Tudor built in 1925-27 by Ralph Rollins, owner of Rollins Hosiery Mills. Rollins and cosmetics maker Carl Weeks, who built another Des Moines home, the Salisbury House, were fascinated by English architecture. Both homes were designed by local architects Byron Boyd and Herbert Moore, and both are on the National Register of Historic Places.
In December the Des Moines Register reported that Hubbell Realty became the fifth owner of the mansion. The company bought the home for $1.75 million as part of a 2007 in which Hubbell agreed to buy properties owned by developer Lloyd Clarke's holding company.
The nearly 12,000 square foot home is on 1.86 acres and can be used as either a commercial property or a home. The property reportedly includes 16th century ship beams and ceiling beams from the inn where William Shakespeare performed as well as stained glass designed by Frank Lloyd Wright. Rollins sold the home in 1931 to the estate of Meredith Corp. founder, E.T. Meredith. Meredith's daughter, Mildred, and her husband owned the home until the 1970s when it was sold to a local lawyer who used it as office space. He sold it in 1995 to the Clarke Companies which added 5,300 square feet of contemporary office space but also rented it out for weddings and other events.
It's a well-crafted home but it's hard to say what will happen to it next. Whoever acquires it has the onus of preserving as much of its historic structure as possible while still making it livable. One thing is for certain, Hubbell Realty isn't making any money on the deal, this estate is listed at $1.7 million.
How Kidnapping Suspect Passes Time Behind Bars
Chili's Waitress Fired Over Facebook Post Insulting 'Stupid Cops'
These American Companies Refused To Sign The Bangladesh Safety Accord
Billboard Music Awards: Worst Dressed (or Most Daring?) From Past Red Carpets
HSBC Plans 14,000 More Job Cuts
PHOTOS: 10 Deadliest Periods In History (NEW BOOK)
Forbidden America: Cold War-Era Map Shows No-Go Zones For Soviet Tourists
Man Takes Dump In Background Of Instructional Workout Video
Teen Who Died During Her First Solo Drive May Have Been Texting
Tenants: Stench of Death Makes St. Louis Complex 'Unlivable'
Famous Roadside Attractions
Former OJ Attorney Gives Shocking Testimony
Taylor Swift Q and A: What Does She Splurge on in Las Vegas?
Hands-on with the Samsung Galaxy S 4 running stock Android 4.2
Guess Which State Boasts The Most Million-Dollar Homes?
Bill Gates regains title of world's richest person as Microsoft stock hits five-year high
Courtney Stodden Has A Sex Tape
LOOK: There's Something Wrong With This Picture
McDonald's Store Owners Fear Fast Food Chain Becoming Too Slow
PHOTO: Looking Good! Chaz Bono Loses 65 Pounds
PREGNANT!
Waitress Surprised With HUGE Tip On Tiny Bill
New Leads In Case Of Missing British Girl
Student Shot Dead During Botched Home Invasion
Will Smith, Jaden Smith Get Photobombed
Jodi Arias' Lawyers Want Out
Pictures Showing Pregnant Teens' Bumps Banned From Yearbook
Victim's Sister To Arias: 'Our Minds Are Permanently Stained'
LOOK: Khloe K Shows Curves In SKIN TIGHT Dress
The Afterlife Of Andy Kaufman
LOOK: Mind-Blowing Optical Illusions
'The Voice' Shakeup
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
John Green Jan 21st 2010 7:06PM
Lets keep our fingers crossed that the new owner will understand and save this house rather than tear it down. The aerial shot of the property is great, you get a true sense of the grounds. Whoever "updated" the kitchen should be shot. I can't imagine what they were thinking, the kitchen doesn't have ANYTHING to do with the architectural style of the house. Dumb, dumb, dumb.