http://www.luxist.com/2009/09/11/tiffany-and-co-doesnt-want-an-handm-next-door/ Luxist Comments for Tiffany & Co. Doesn't Want An H&M Next Door http://www.luxist.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.luxist.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.luxist.com/2009/09/11/tiffany-and-co-doesnt-want-an-handm-next-door/http://www.luxist.com/2009/09/11/tiffany-and-co-doesnt-want-an-handm-next-door/
That H&M would cause Tiffanys injury seems like a lot of BS. If some rich people cannot see a "cheaper" store next to a luxury one it is just silly. Those people should realise that intelligence (and good personality, probably!) does not sit in the tie knot (something a high-prize lawyer told me. Good expression, btw). So looking down at people who visit a "cheap store" is just silly. And to make a court case out of it!!!!]]>Sep 11th 2009 3:17AMhttp://www.luxist.com/2009/09/11/tiffany-and-co-doesnt-want-an-handm-next-door/http://www.luxist.com/2009/09/11/tiffany-and-co-doesnt-want-an-handm-next-door/
H&M provides non-luxury goods such as jewelry, which (believe it or not) reduces the effective consumption of other jewelry producers (a.k.a. Tiffany's).
Then again, seeing the target audiences of both retailers (teens vs. adults), maybe it's more of a disturbance to T's clientele, who doesn't want to listen to kids scream and mess around their shopping.

But yeah, completely agree with you...
Going to trial with this is just plain stupid.]]>Sep 11th 2009 7:51PMhttp://www.luxist.com/2009/09/11/tiffany-and-co-doesnt-want-an-handm-next-door/http://www.luxist.com/2009/09/11/tiffany-and-co-doesnt-want-an-handm-next-door/Sep 13th 2009 10:44PM