<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Luxist - Comments for Which Cities Are Ready For A Real Estate Rebound?</title>
<link>http://www.luxist.com/2009/08/31/which-cities-are-ready-for-a-real-estate-rebound/</link>
<description>Luxist Comments for Which Cities Are Ready For A Real Estate Rebound?</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Which Cities Are Ready For A Real Estate Rebound?]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2009/08/31/which-cities-are-ready-for-a-real-estate-rebound/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2009/08/31/which-cities-are-ready-for-a-real-estate-rebound/</guid><description><![CDATA[As a former resident of the Tulsa area, I am not surprised to see it on the list. A few things to note though.<br><br>First, Tulsa did not experience the real estate boom like the rest of the country. And the "crash" was not as bad either. I can attest to this having refinanced during the boom and sold during the crash. Not much gained, not much lost. It just took longer during the crash to sell.<br><br>In general, the economy is not bullish there but stable. And recent visits showed considerable activity above the norm for Tulsa. Many upbeat, promising developments.<br><br>I do take issue with the "energy economy" there though. While there are still a good number of energy companies and will continue to be, considerable brain drain has occurred over the years as companies migrate to Houston.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd Henkel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 1st 2009 9:24PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
