<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Luxist - Comments for Should A Historic Mansion Meet The Wrecking Ball?</title>
<link>http://www.luxist.com/2009/06/03/should-a-historic-mansion-meet-the-wrecking-ball/</link>
<description>Luxist Comments for Should A Historic Mansion Meet The Wrecking Ball?</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Should A Historic Mansion Meet The Wrecking Ball?]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2009/06/03/should-a-historic-mansion-meet-the-wrecking-ball/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2009/06/03/should-a-historic-mansion-meet-the-wrecking-ball/</guid><description><![CDATA[How sad.  Why is architecture so easily dismissed as an art form?  If someone bought the Mona Lisa and decided to paint over it, there would be a huge outcry!  But important architecture is routinely torn down at the owner's whim.  In cases such as this, the 'owners' need to realize they are but caretakers of an important American artform.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 11:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Should A Historic Mansion Meet The Wrecking Ball?]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2009/06/03/should-a-historic-mansion-meet-the-wrecking-ball/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2009/06/03/should-a-historic-mansion-meet-the-wrecking-ball/</guid><description><![CDATA[Preservationists certainly have to walk a delicate balance between encouraging owners to reconsider razing or even signifcantly altering a home vs. outright lobbying for restrictions to be placed on owners. No one likes being told by others - especially sans any financial compensation - what they can and cannot do with a home. <br><br>You would've thought that some zoning historical restrictions mixed with significant tax breaks for compensation could've been imposed before the property was sold. (This is if there truly is that much local interest in saving it.) As I understand the property has languished for years so this didn't happen over night.<br><br>That said I wonder what owner would buy such an historic, rare and seemingly attractive offering which has been underwatch by preservationists for years with plans to raze it? Its odd to me that someone would want so badly to live in a neighborhood knowing they've seriously ticked off the neighbors before they even set foot in the area. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Spectacular Bid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 3rd 2009 1:57PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>