<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Luxist - Comments for Rado Ceramica Jubile Diamond Baguettes Watch</title>
<link>http://www.luxist.com/2009/05/16/rado-ceramica-jubile-diamond-baguettes-watch/</link>
<description>Luxist Comments for Rado Ceramica Jubile Diamond Baguettes Watch</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2010 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rado Ceramica Jubile Diamond Baguettes Watch]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2009/05/16/rado-ceramica-jubile-diamond-baguettes-watch/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2009/05/16/rado-ceramica-jubile-diamond-baguettes-watch/</guid><description><![CDATA[So this watch is the "first" all-ceramic watch from Rado, but then it's not really all-ceramic (movement, crystal, dial... what else was not mentioned?). Why is it the "first" then when previous Rado watches are not all-ceramic? Does "all-ceramic" just imply that the back is now ceramic, or the structure is now ceramic? I have a Ceramica Multifunction and wondering which parts of it are now ceramic to be considered "all-ceramic".<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dyt1983]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 16th 2009 3:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rado Ceramica Jubile Diamond Baguettes Watch]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2009/05/16/rado-ceramica-jubile-diamond-baguettes-watch/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2009/05/16/rado-ceramica-jubile-diamond-baguettes-watch/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is a good comment. The language of "first all ceramic" came from Rado themselves - and to be honest they didn't explain much. I was sort of musing on the statement as there is plenty of non ceramic parts. I believe it has to do with the fact that the bracelet and case are joined together in a manner where all you visually see is ceramic (save for elements of the face of course). So in reality, I am not really sure what is all ceramic about it. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ariel Adams]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 16th 2009 6:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rado Ceramica Jubile Diamond Baguettes Watch]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2009/05/16/rado-ceramica-jubile-diamond-baguettes-watch/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2009/05/16/rado-ceramica-jubile-diamond-baguettes-watch/</guid><description><![CDATA[the bracelet and case are made of high tech ceramics. the links are attached to each other with small inner links made of a very hard composite material. and ofcourse the crystal is made of very hard sapphire glass. the rado sintra is a watch that is almost completely made of high tech ceramics; only the crystal and the clasp aren't.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jos.van.hugte]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 8th 2009 4:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rado Ceramica Jubile Diamond Baguettes Watch]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2009/05/16/rado-ceramica-jubile-diamond-baguettes-watch/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2009/05/16/rado-ceramica-jubile-diamond-baguettes-watch/</guid><description><![CDATA[Glad to lend a hand...<br>Let's not get it too complicated...Ceramica was the "first" true Ceramic watch Rado  introduced  when it came out, never was it done before, way back when. The Ceramica is the "grand pa' all ceramic watches that have come out since. Watch companies love to repaet their claim to fame, love to remind you that they are special and history makers. This watch is most likely the same Ceramica watch you can buy already , but with the diamonds. That simple.  Swisslivingame, living in Switzerland..<br>P.S Looks great, how much will it cost ??]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[giorginomex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 15th 2009 2:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rado Ceramica Jubile Diamond Baguettes Watch]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2009/05/16/rado-ceramica-jubile-diamond-baguettes-watch/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2009/05/16/rado-ceramica-jubile-diamond-baguettes-watch/</guid><description><![CDATA[Glad to lend a hand...<br>Let's not get it too complicated...Ceramica was the "first" true Ceramic watch Rado  introduced  when it came out, never was it done before, way back when. The Ceramica is the "grand pa' all ceramic watches that have come out since. Watch companies love to repaet their claim to fame, love to remind you that they are special and history makers. This watch is most likely the same Ceramica watch you can buy already , but with the diamonds. That simple.  Swisslivingame, living in Switzerland..<br>P.S Looks great, how much will it cost ??]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[giorginomex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 15th 2009 3:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rado Ceramica Jubile Diamond Baguettes Watch]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2009/05/16/rado-ceramica-jubile-diamond-baguettes-watch/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2009/05/16/rado-ceramica-jubile-diamond-baguettes-watch/</guid><description><![CDATA[Thanks for the follow up. Watch companies often like to make a big deal out of facts that are either old, or not nearly as impressive as they sound. Not really sure about the price - could really vary, and those black diamonds on the dial typically inflate the price a lot. Not going to venture a guess on this one. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ariel Adams]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 15th 2009 7:11PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>