<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Luxist - Comments for Greubel Forsey Invention Piece No. 3  Watch</title>
<link>http://www.luxist.com/2009/05/09/greubel-forsey-invention-piece-no-3-watch/</link>
<description>Luxist Comments for Greubel Forsey Invention Piece No. 3  Watch</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2013 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Greubel Forsey Invention Piece No. 3  Watch]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2009/05/09/greubel-forsey-invention-piece-no-3-watch/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2009/05/09/greubel-forsey-invention-piece-no-3-watch/</guid><description><![CDATA[If you had actually done your research (fact checking), like a true professional, then you might have realized that the Invention Piece you are referring to is not the only style of watch introduced by GF.  Had you actually contacted GF, or met with them in Basel, then you might have discovered their crown jewel - the "Double Tourbillon Technique".  <br><br>Here are a few examples for your reference:<br><br><a href="http://professionalwatches.com/2009/04/baselworld_2009-_greubel_forse.html" rel="nofollow">http://professionalwatches.com/2009/04/baselworld_2009-_greubel_forse.html</a><br><br><a href="http://www.worldtempus.com/en/news/watch-news/detail/article/1238251924-greubel-foresey-double-tourbillon-technique-1/" rel="nofollow">http://www.worldtempus.com/en/news/watch-news/detail/article/1238251924-greubel-foresey-double-tourbillon-technique-1/</a><br><br>It does not look like their past pieces does it?  Maybe you can make note of this on your, and I quote "Expert Watch Review Site", ablogtoread.  :)<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 9th 2009 5:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Greubel Forsey Invention Piece No. 3  Watch]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2009/05/09/greubel-forsey-invention-piece-no-3-watch/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2009/05/09/greubel-forsey-invention-piece-no-3-watch/</guid><description><![CDATA[Jason, <br>   You sound pretty irked by this. This is my opinion and I did not suggest that every singe Greubel Forsey watch looks exactly the same. It is the same situation with F.P. Journe, the watches are starting to look (for the most part) like derivatives of one another - but there are exceptions. You are getting quite upset about a little opinion that does not err of facts - the people who buy the watches are the ones who will decide if they like the style. I am commenting on their design ingenuity. Further you are one to comment on being a watch expert and professional - if you wish to prove yourself in this regard, you might consider actually writing on your site versus merely posting pictures. Thanks buddy. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ariel Adams]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 9th 2009 5:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Greubel Forsey Invention Piece No. 3  Watch]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2009/05/09/greubel-forsey-invention-piece-no-3-watch/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2009/05/09/greubel-forsey-invention-piece-no-3-watch/</guid><description><![CDATA[No I never said I was an expert, nor does my site say so anywhere.  Just a fan of watches.<br><br>I do appreciate your critique of my site.  Maybe you will appreciate mine as well?  <br><br>I see it very often.  New guy starts a watch site.  Says he is an expert.  Bases expertise on enthusiasm, not experience.  Yes it does irk me, but not much further than this comment.<br><br>Best Regards]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 9th 2009 10:01PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>