<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Luxist - Comments for Vera Wang Rethinking Lavender Label</title>
<link>http://www.luxist.com/2009/03/30/vera-wang-rethinking-lavender-label/</link>
<description>Luxist Comments for Vera Wang Rethinking Lavender Label</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Vera Wang Rethinking Lavender Label]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2009/03/30/vera-wang-rethinking-lavender-label/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2009/03/30/vera-wang-rethinking-lavender-label/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'd love to think I could buy, say, a nice inexpensive but well-made shirt from one of these cheap designer lines, but so far, seriously not.  When I go to the stores to look at them, all I see is stuff that a - fits no one, and b - is poorly sewn, and c - is made of cheap fabric that might as well have its price printed on it as part of the pattern.  I live in Orange County CA and volunteer with some pretty wealthy people, and I can't see them being fooled for a minute.  What do other people think?  Deirdre?  Anyone?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[shieldsbrown]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 3rd 2009 1:21PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
