<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Luxist - Comments for Thomas Prescher Perpetual Calendar QP1 Watch</title>
<link>http://www.luxist.com/2009/03/27/thomas-prescher-perpetual-calendar-qp1-watch/</link>
<description>Luxist Comments for Thomas Prescher Perpetual Calendar QP1 Watch</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2013 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Thomas Prescher Perpetual Calendar QP1 Watch]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2009/03/27/thomas-prescher-perpetual-calendar-qp1-watch/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2009/03/27/thomas-prescher-perpetual-calendar-qp1-watch/</guid><description><![CDATA[An absolutely stunning take on the perpetual calendar complication (although I think I once saw a slightly similar idea from Maurice Lacroix), but shouldn't the Roman 4 be IV, not IIII? What's the story behind that?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Arbitrageur]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 27th 2009 12:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Thomas Prescher Perpetual Calendar QP1 Watch]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2009/03/27/thomas-prescher-perpetual-calendar-qp1-watch/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2009/03/27/thomas-prescher-perpetual-calendar-qp1-watch/</guid><description><![CDATA[An absolutely stunning take on the perpetual calendar complication (although I think I once saw a slightly similar idea from Maurice Lacroix), but shouldn't the Roman 4 be IV, not IIII? What's the story behind that?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Arbitrageur]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 27th 2009 12:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Thomas Prescher Perpetual Calendar QP1 Watch]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2009/03/27/thomas-prescher-perpetual-calendar-qp1-watch/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2009/03/27/thomas-prescher-perpetual-calendar-qp1-watch/</guid><description><![CDATA[Using "IV" rather than "IIII" has become common only in modern times, and for some reason (there are competing theories), it remains traditional to use the "IIII" form on clocks and watches.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kate]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 27th 2009 5:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Thomas Prescher Perpetual Calendar QP1 Watch]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2009/03/27/thomas-prescher-perpetual-calendar-qp1-watch/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2009/03/27/thomas-prescher-perpetual-calendar-qp1-watch/</guid><description><![CDATA[Thank you, Kate. I did not know that, and never noticed it on other watches. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Arbitrageur]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 27th 2009 8:45PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>