Mick Jagger's Latest Model Daughter

by Jared Paul Stern (RSS feed)
Aug 30th 2008 at 8:01AM

Looks like wrinkly Rolling Stone Mick Jagger has sired yet another gorgeous girl: Georgia May Jagger, 16, his daughter by Texan stunner Jerry Hall. Following in the fashionable footsteps of the rocker's other daughters, Jade and Elizabeth, Georgia May just made her modeling debut in the UK for the London Mail on Sunday's magazine, and has signed with the Independent Talent agency. To our eyes, Georgia May has a major modeling career ahead of her. Having Mick Jagger and Jerry Hall for parents won't hurt either, obviously. And we bet we haven't seen the last of her dad's stunning offspring; after all, he has sired seven children with four different women (that we know of).

[via Kempt]

Tags: Elizabeth Jagger, ElizabethJagger, Georgia May Jagger, GeorgiaMayJagger, Jade Jagger, JadeJagger, Jerry Hall, JerryHall, Mick Jagger, MickJagger, Models, Rolling Stones, RollingStones

Subscribe to these comments

Reader Comments (Page 2 of 4)

dave Aug 31st 2008 1:20PM

Christoper M Warden: You are an idiot a typical McCain voter! See you in November loser!

jr Aug 31st 2008 1:43PM

Why is it that people of wealth don't fix their children's teeth? We are average income people and I have fix our children's teeth. Come on parents. Mick, Billy Ray, Jewel (self), Eric Roberts, fix your kids teeth. They will thank you later.

Anna Aug 31st 2008 1:30PM

Great,yet another reason to feel fat and ugly.

James Aug 31st 2008 1:35PM

Looking at both your comments, I'm going to call it a draw as to which of you is the bigger moron/pervert.

steve Aug 31st 2008 1:37PM

She is average looking for a girl her age.

I was most perplexed at the size of her buck teeth for a girl her age. They can't still be her baby teeth could they?

s Aug 31st 2008 1:38PM

Dave you are an idiot christoper comment was kind and it has nothing to do with McCain. Can't you read?

... Aug 31st 2008 3:06PM

Am I the only one who thinks she's pretty? Not everyone has perfect teeth and it's no big deal. I know plenty of beautiful people who's teeth aren't absolutely perfect.

JUNE Aug 31st 2008 2:04PM

I think they should let the stars kids grow up, just because their parents are famous is not a reason to think they are models. I am sorry but this little girl is cute, but not a model,and why is people dragging politics into this? grow up.

Angelica Aug 31st 2008 3:07PM

EEEWWW! I'm sorry but she is just not pretty. It's not even her teeth that I think make her unable to be a really successful model. It's her whole face I'm sorry but there are much better people out there who don't have to use Mommy and Daddy's name to get somewhere.

And when you say that someone's insides are better then their outsides and that it shouldn't matter, your right, IF YOU ACTUALLY KNOW THE PERSON!!!! SO DON'T BE SAYING THAT SHE'S A GOOD PERSON JUST CAUSE SHE DOES SOMETHING OR TELLS YOU SOMETHING THAT MAY O MAY NOT BE TRUE.

Plus if she wants to be a model she'll have to get used to people judging her because that's all she is, a picture to be judged by the rest of society to say that we all need to look like her or else we're deemed ugly so get over the fact that people are judging ANOTHER sixteen year old for her looks. It's never going to stop no matter how much you bitch.

Val Aug 31st 2008 3:07PM

"8-31-2008 @ 1:00PM Katie said...British teeth are horrible. Don't they have dentists over there?"

Yeah, but they have socialized medicine there, so it takes years just to get in to see one...

Sara Aug 31st 2008 3:24PM

To me, she looks the most like her daddy out of all the Jagger kids, which is awesome. Big lips & teeth, and kinda has that pretty/ugly thing going on, although she is by no means ugly just a little quirky. Definitely looks like Mick in his younger days...he was so damn sexy IMO but not just for his looks alone so I have to say if this girl doesn't prove to have "talent" (whatever that means for a model) then I don't think she's gonna be anything major at all.

Katie Aug 31st 2008 8:58PM

I think she is the tail end of 'average or ugly as high fashion' phase we just went through. It started with heroine chic and went down from there. Has anyone been keeping tabs on the runways and beauty pageants lately? Notice who's winning? Columbia/Latin beauties. They take the time to look beautiful, smooth out their rough spots/ correct imperfections. This buck tooth girl with the big mouth would have been laughed right out of Columbian modeling agencies. The Columbia/Latin women are bringing back glamour and the rest of the world is behind. To think this Jagger daughter or Courtney Love's daughter are model quality is absurd. Just another instance of someone wanting to make money off of the back of celebrity. I guarantee you someone approach Jagger & Hall and thought this would be a money maker.

LJ Aug 31st 2008 9:39PM

I do not think she is pretty. She looks just like her Dad and he is not something to look at.
They will give a contract to just anyone.

Clara Sep 1st 2008 9:26PM

British teeth? Diana, Princess of Wales, had stunning teeth. Charles has the teeth of a pauper. Zara Phillips also has lovely British teeth, as does Kate Middleton. For a different age, Helen Mirren has a lovely smile, and Joan Collins still has a great sexy mouth. Being British isn't an excuse.

duwane clappsaddle Sep 2nd 2008 12:39PM

she's what we like to call ARKANSAS PRETTY!!

Brita Sep 1st 2008 9:34PM

As a working High Fashion Model, her look is something we are seeing more of on the Cat Walk and in editorials. The 'Eastern European baby doll' look is starting to lose its grip and girls with strange and more pronounced features are gracing covers and leading shows.

In New York this week for prep I've already seen quite a few girls like her. I think, however, with her famous background, she will only work for a few seasons at the most. She is not a Gemma Ward, Agyness Deyn, or Coco Rocha...they have interesting looks. She, however, is a very popular look at the moment, which is why I believe she will only work for a few seasons.

That isn't to say she isn't lovely, however.

cheri Sep 1st 2008 10:01PM

She's got the perfect exotic "look" for a runway model. Good luck to her.

emiline Sep 1st 2008 10:02PM

she's not too bad. remember jo lumley in the sixties? her mouth goes halfway around her head but, she was a fabulous model. leave it out. if the girl has modeling talent it doesn't matter if she's got flaws.

Autumn Sep 1st 2008 10:10PM

every1 you have to remember modeling is looking for something new.....a new face, and besides they wouldn't have booked her if they didn't think she would make it. Every1 is only looking at one thing....the teeth. Look at the whole picture, and i can tell you one thing.........i see beauty!

Brita Sep 1st 2008 10:20PM

Autumn, you also forget that many agencies also book 'filler models'. These are girls who, while yes the do look unique to the average person, are only 'average' in terms of the modeling world.

These girls only work a few seasons and then quit. They help fill in the runway. Have you ever been backstage during a fashion show? Its pure chaos; the second you step off that platform, you have to basically strip down while running to hair and make-up for changes/touch-ups while getting dressed and making sure you don't tear the outfit.

All in all, you generally have five minutes. Imagine if there wasn't 'filler models' how much more hectic it would be.

Previous 20 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Most Recent | Next 20 Comments