Breaking news Feed
- Sleep with Rolex & Patek Philippe at Florence's Luxe L'O - Hotel L'Orologio
- German Billionaire Offers World's Fastest Long-Range Superyacht for $85 Million
- $2.7 Million Patek Philippe Watch Stars in Christie's Sale
- Charter Steven Spielberg's New Superyacht for $1.3 Million a Week: The World's Most Expensive
- The Classicist: VO Guns Debuts the Falcon, World's Most Expensive Rifle, for $820,000 [EXCLUSIVE]
- Win a Ride With Harrison Ford in His Private Plane & More in Bid to Save the Earth Auction - Part I
- Memo to Prince William: Before the Royal Wedding Have Kate Middleton Sign a Princely Pre-Nup
- Steve McQueen's Famed 1970 Porsche 911S at Auction
- Theatre Of Horticulture: The Orchid Show Opens at the New York Botanical Garden
- EXCLUSIVE: Abramovich Said to Be Owner of World's Most Expensive Painting
Featured stories Feed
- The Classicist: Southern Proper's Timeless Style
- Fairy Tale Castle on the French Riviera, Estate of the Day
- Shoot 'n Share Camcorder Projector: Simple Enough for a Child to Use
- Five Fabulous Things to Do On A Ski Trip Without the Skis in Park City, Utah
- The Classicist: Thoroughbreds, Bourbon and Private Planes from Flexjet
- World's Most Expensive Poker Set for $7.5 Million
- Herman Miller Sayl Ergonomic Work Chair Review
- Luxist Giveaway: Element Case Vapor Pro iPhone 4 Case
- The Fashion Statement: The Rise of Flatforms
- RSVIP: Dinner with an Astronaut and Fireworks in Costa Rica
Categories
- 10 Luxuries (13)
- Apparel (1516)
- Architecture & Design (83)
- Art (1054)
- Auctions (1452)
- Big Givers (129)
- Books (300)
- By Design (48)
- Celebrity Design (216)
- Celebrity Shopping (1475)
- Charity (592)
- Charity of the Day (163)
- Children (102)
- Cigars (363)
- Cosmetics and Fragrance (432)
- Crimes and Misdemeanors (116)
- Decor (2404)
- Dining (1562)
- Estates (3822)
- Events (737)
- Gadgets (1336)
- Green (369)
- Handbags (2263)
- Holiday Guides (120)
- Jewelry (1651)
- Lux Tips (31)
- Luxury Cars & Autos (2724)
- Luxury Shopping (91)
- Luxury Travel & Hotels (2962)
- Modern Gentleman (12)
- Men's Style (529)
- Pets (199)
- Real Estate Developments (536)
- Services (403)
- Shoes (474)
- Spas (411)
- Spirits (1155)
- Sports (658)
- Tell Us Everything (8)
- The Classicist (168)
- The Fashion Statement (104)
- Timepieces / Watches (2089)
- Video (65)
- Wealth (433)
- Wine (1460)
- Wings (717)
- Writing Instruments (183)
- Yachts & Sailing (1023)
Featured Galleries
Blogs We Love
- A Continuous Lean
- A Luxury Travel Blog
- Born Rich
- CIRCA Jewels Blog
- Creed Boutique Blog
- Departures
- Dr. Vino
- EgoTV
- FabSugar
- Home Decor
- Home Design
- Hotel Chatter
- How To Spend It
- If It's Hip, It's Here
- JamesList
- Just Luxe
- Lavish Property
- Luxuo
- New York Observer: Culture
- Notes On A Party
- Real Estalker
- Robb Report
- ShelterPop
- Splendora
- The Life of Luxury
- The Luxury Spot
- The Sartorialist
Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
8-27-2008 @ 12:44PM
Pami said...
What an ass! What idiot reasoning did this man have to think he had the right to do such an act. Not only did he destroy something that was considered to be a great work of art, but he destroyed the monetary value which could have been used to help numerous people. If he didn't like it he should have sold it on or given it back to the artist or something of the sort. People like that make me sick. They think they are not held up to the same standards as the rest of the world.
Reply
8-28-2008 @ 8:40AM
Adrienne W said...
How was the monetary value of the destroyed painting going to be used to help numerous people? Do you mean the heirs could have sold the painting and gotten rich? If so, big deal. It's not like the money would have gone to charity. Just to people who are probably financially well off already. No sympathy there. Also for your information, Breslauer had every right to destroy the painting HE paid for and which was of HIM. If someone paints a picture of you and you don't like it, why would you give it back to the artist to sell? Why would you want someone to own a picture of you? Especially, one you don't like? It was his picture so he had the right to do whatever he wanted with it. Period. I would have destroyed it too. And, asked for a refund of my money.