<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Luxist - Comments for Acugems, Gemstone Facial Treatment</title>
<link>http://www.luxist.com/2008/08/09/acugems-gemstone-facial-treatment/</link>
<description>Luxist Comments for Acugems, Gemstone Facial Treatment</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Acugems, Gemstone Facial Treatment]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2008/08/09/acugems-gemstone-facial-treatment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2008/08/09/acugems-gemstone-facial-treatment/</guid><description><![CDATA[Funny that you should spot that little puff piece in a weekly suburban newspaper.   I just sent Amy Saltzman an e-mail yesterday about how uncritically her piece treated the spa owner's claims about "therapeutic light frequencies" from gemstones.  <br><br>Let's face it: that sounds like a bunch of bunkum.  Similar "microcurrent stimulation facelift" treatments without the gems cost about half as much as these pricey treatments.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RC]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 10th 2008 2:31AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>