<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Luxist - Comments for Q Tonic</title>
<link>http://www.luxist.com/2008/06/21/q-tonic/</link>
<description>Luxist Comments for Q Tonic</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Q Tonic]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2008/06/21/q-tonic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2008/06/21/q-tonic/</guid><description><![CDATA[I tried this after a strong recommendation from that staff at the much respected Sam's Wines of Chicago. They had a promo dropping the price around $8 for the 4-pack.<br><br>As much as I wanted to enjoy it I simply could not. I tried it with a variety of high end and solid gin's (Tanqueray Rangpur Gin, Boodles, Bombay Sapphire Gin) and it simply not only does not add value it detracts from the classic G&T taste. <br><br>In a word - it's an gimick and overpriced at that. I'm sure some will swear by and further claim those who don't like it haven't the sophistcation etc.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[spectacular bid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 22nd 2008 3:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Q Tonic]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2008/06/21/q-tonic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2008/06/21/q-tonic/</guid><description><![CDATA[I tried this after a strong recommendation from that staff at the much respected Sam's Wines of Chicago. They had a promo dropping the price around $8 for the 4-pack.<br><br>As much as I wanted to enjoy it I simply could not. I tried it with a variety of high end and solid gin's (Tanqueray Rangpur Gin, Boodles, Bombay Sapphire Gin) and it simply not only does not add value it detracts from the classic G&T taste. <br><br>In a word - it's an gimick and overpriced at that. I'm sure some will swear by and further claim those who don't like it haven't the sophistcation etc.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Spectacular Bid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 22nd 2008 2:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Q Tonic]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2008/06/21/q-tonic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2008/06/21/q-tonic/</guid><description><![CDATA[I've been getting Q Tonic at Sam's ever since they started stocking it. I love it and will never go back. I can't imagine what else you are mixing with your gin? Standard tonic water overpowers a quality spirit with sticky sweet syrupy awfulness,  while Q Tonic allows flavor and depth to shine through. On this one the "experts" are right... this is simply a much better drink. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chicago Sommelier]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2008 2:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Q Tonic]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2008/06/21/q-tonic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2008/06/21/q-tonic/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hey Spec,<br>Where have you been??? I hope all is well.<br>CK]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[C.K. Dexter-Haven]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 22nd 2008 4:32PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
