The Scorpion Hybrid Supercar

It's red, it's sleek, it's the Scorpion from the newly formed Ronn Motor Company. It's main features include the fact that it goes from 0-60 in 3.5 seconds and gets 40 mpg. So what's so special about that? How about the fact that it's also a hydrogen burning hybrid?
I'm no mechanic (couldn't be farther from it, actually) but the description on AutoblogGreen of how the engine works is really interesting. This car sounds like a really satisfying way to satisfy both a need for speed and an interest in preserving the planet (too bad it looks like a refurbished Viper).
The Scorpion will be manufactured in Texas and should be available to consumers this fall.
Live from Microsoft's New Generation Xbox event!
Xbox Reveal liveblog on Joystiq
Dozens Killed in Oklahoma Tornado; Death Toll to Rise
Xbox One architecture panel liveblog!
H&M's Plus-Size Model Jennie Runk Says She Chose To Gain Weight
Okla. Sheriff's Deputy Finds Dog Guarding Body Buried Under Destroyed Home
Watch: Kansas Meteorologist Seeks Shelter From Tornado
South American 'Crazy' Ants Are a Threat in Southern US
Selena Gomez Leaving Justin Bieber's House: Booty Call Rumors Swirl
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Jonathan Fung Jun 12th 2008 2:30PM
Does that look like a Dodge Viper to anyone else? It sure doesn't look like one to me.... I'd describe it more of a cross of the Tesla Roadster and a Porsche Carrera GT. But I guess that's why this isn't a car blog. :]
Visionep Jun 12th 2008 3:25PM
It looks like a computer mockup that was put together to garner interest from investors. These new cars are the new "Internet Boom" so a bunch of unscrupulous business people are putting out "ideas" and wild claims to sucker in investors.
This hype has been around a fair number of blogs about several different vehicles most with little to no technical information or pictures of a real working prototypes.
verdegrrl Jun 12th 2008 10:12PM
One of the things standing in the way hydrogen powered cars is that there is no feasible way to produce hydrogen w/o using more fuel. As poster #14 says in the link, science is being ignored.