<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Luxist - Comments for The Top 10 Jewelry Brands (As Ranked by Wealthy Consumers)</title>
<link>http://www.luxist.com/2008/02/09/the-top-10-jewelry-brands-as-ranked-by-wealthy-consumers/</link>
<description>Luxist Comments for The Top 10 Jewelry Brands (As Ranked by Wealthy Consumers)</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Top 10 Jewelry Brands (As Ranked by Wealthy Consumers)]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2008/02/09/the-top-10-jewelry-brands-as-ranked-by-wealthy-consumers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2008/02/09/the-top-10-jewelry-brands-as-ranked-by-wealthy-consumers/</guid><description><![CDATA[As someone that believes you can never go wrong with the robin's egg blue box, I'm surprised to see how high Tiffany & Co is ranked. <br><br>T & Co had a period, earlier in this decade, where the catered to the lower-end, market focusing on pre-teens and teens (similar to Coach bags) with sterling silver jewelry to drive their growth and sales. This alienated many of their loyal, traditional customer base. Eventually, Tiffany & Co realized the trend was damaging their reputation as a retailer of high-end jewelry and deemphasized that segment and has now refocused on their wealthier (higher profit) clients.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 9th 2008 11:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Top 10 Jewelry Brands (As Ranked by Wealthy Consumers)]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2008/02/09/the-top-10-jewelry-brands-as-ranked-by-wealthy-consumers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2008/02/09/the-top-10-jewelry-brands-as-ranked-by-wealthy-consumers/</guid><description><![CDATA[Very surprised by this list--it's very middle brow.  Tiffany, Chopard, Bulgari--they all sort of rest on the laurels of their lower priced items, including perfumes.  Give me a real choice, like JAR, Kaufmann, Webb, di Grisogono.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[just me]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 11th 2008 2:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Top 10 Jewelry Brands (As Ranked by Wealthy Consumers)]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2008/02/09/the-top-10-jewelry-brands-as-ranked-by-wealthy-consumers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2008/02/09/the-top-10-jewelry-brands-as-ranked-by-wealthy-consumers/</guid><description><![CDATA[Piaget, Tiffany, Buccaletti, and Mikimoto should all be relagated to numbers 34-37<br>Bvlgari is much, much better! ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Justin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 25th 2008 8:03PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
