Camilla's Million Dollar Makeover

by Deidre Woollard (RSS feed)
Dec 11th 2007 at 2:02PM

Camilla Parker-Bowles will never be Princess Diana but that doesn't mean the sexagenarian can't be glamorous. Perhaps in anticipation of Prince Charles's ascension to the throne, Camilla has been getting more and more stylish. The Sunday Times tallies up the costs of the Duchess's makeover from the hair ( £40,300 a year) to the wardrobe ( £281,000) and her Philip Treacy hats (£13,650). Other costs include tooth whitening, facials, yoga classes and shoes. Just how much does it cost to be Camilla? The Times estimates £507,321.58 and that doesn't even include the all-important jewelry. The Brits seems to be in favor of the new and improved Camilla, the headlines have been full of tributes to her new style.

Tags: camilla parker-bowles, CamillaParker-bowles, england, prince charles, royalty

Filed under: Celebrity Shopping

Source

Subscribe to these comments

Reader Comments (Page 2 of 14)

victoria issacs Dec 13th 2007 9:20AM

You are so right! All of the money in the world cannot fix ugly inside and out. She is a terrible person. I am unsure how she sleeps at night or looks at herself in the mirror!

victoria issacs Dec 12th 2007 9:05AM

Ever since Camilla reared that god awful horse face I pray daily that she will never be photographed that day. You can spend all of the money in the world at the surgeons office, the hairdresser, shopping and in the end a dog is still a dog. Only change is that this dog (even when groomed ) is still a mutt. She is a greedy wench as well.
Poor England!

Michael Feb 14th 2008 12:46PM

If I had a dog with a face like that, I'd shave the dog's butt and walk it backwards.

Sherry Dec 13th 2007 6:21AM

......she is really a king.....and I think they deserve each other!

Freda Dec 13th 2007 11:02PM

With all that money you think she'd get some work done.

Annamarie Dec 13th 2007 1:53PM

Ugly goes right to the bone!

Peaches Dec 13th 2007 6:27AM

At least she didn't have a child outside of wedlock. We all know Harry is not Charles.

Diana knew that Charles loves Camilla. Camilla helped pick Diana out. It was arranged. She married her anyway because she wanted to be Princess. Not to mention she admitted throwing herself down the stairs when she was Pregnant.

It is wonderful that Charles got to married her true love, and didn't just marry somebody because of some silly rule that you had to marry a virgin.

birdie Dec 13th 2007 8:39AM

Peaches you are so right!!! It boggles the mind that no one sees this. Why is Diana elevated to sainthood when she made maybe worse moral choices than Charles or Camilla put together.

r s Jan 3rd 2008 10:54AM

Really? Not up on Royal gossip here in the States...Who's Harry's father?

PB Dec 13th 2007 12:05PM

And what makes you think Harry is not Charles's? Look at Diana's family - plenty of red heads there.

Yes, unfortunately Camilla did help Charles to pick Diana. Shame on Camilla! As we all know what happened on during the honeymoon. Camilla was not able to even then leave Charles alone with his then VIRGIN new wife Diana who was so much in love with Charles. Reason Camilla was not able to be what Diana was, was that exact reason. Camilla was party girl NOT a VIRGIN.

I think it for Diana to get to the state to throw herself down the stairs while expecting a baby must have been a most horrendous time in her life. She loved all the children. One can only think how she must have been feeling as she loved and wanted her own.

Unfortunately Charles married Diana for that exact reason ie that she was a virgin. Also he has always wanted to be a King. Needed a wife and heirs. He was pressured for marriage.

Now ofcourse it is easy for him to carry on with Camilla after all what has happened. I hope Charles will NEVER become a King - it all should be passed on to William.

In the end I find nothing wonderful about Charles and Camilla's love for each other. She is a good mother figure for him as we all know. Having their devious plans how to spend their time together while Charles was still married to Diana was nothing to cheer about.

Hamrick4 Dec 13th 2007 1:53PM

You need to read what you wrote and rethink your remarks. You can't spell nor use the English language very well so I feel you should just SHUSHHHHH!!! Your ignorance is showing and Birdie? Your's too for agreeing with such ludicrous comments. GROW UP!

DJ Dec 13th 2007 6:30AM

You're right, WHO CARES...nobody cares about British Royalty except British Royalty.

Marci Dec 13th 2007 6:35AM

I agree with Andi...she's still the same whore that broke Diana's heart....and frankly...I have 20/20 vision and I don't see one thing that's changed...she's as ugly as she ever was! and...they DO deserve one another..they'll get the BEST of the ugly awards for this century!