Camilla's Million Dollar Makeover

by Deidre Woollard (RSS feed)
Dec 11th 2007 at 2:02PM

Camilla Parker-Bowles will never be Princess Diana but that doesn't mean the sexagenarian can't be glamorous. Perhaps in anticipation of Prince Charles's ascension to the throne, Camilla has been getting more and more stylish. The Sunday Times tallies up the costs of the Duchess's makeover from the hair ( £40,300 a year) to the wardrobe ( £281,000) and her Philip Treacy hats (£13,650). Other costs include tooth whitening, facials, yoga classes and shoes. Just how much does it cost to be Camilla? The Times estimates £507,321.58 and that doesn't even include the all-important jewelry. The Brits seems to be in favor of the new and improved Camilla, the headlines have been full of tributes to her new style.

Tags: camilla parker-bowles, CamillaParker-bowles, england, prince charles, royalty

Filed under: Celebrity Shopping

Source

Subscribe to these comments

Reader Comments (Page 14 of 14)

Sue Dec 15th 2007 9:36AM

I don't think she is ugly. She looks very sophisticated in this picture; however, I don't see a "new" Camilla, she has always looked like this.
I think what makes her look "ugly" is her history. We have that etched in our minds, and it makes her look ugly on the outside.
Charles should have never married Diana if he has always been in love with this woman. That said, Diana is gone, the past is the past; everybody's got to move on someday.
She will receive what's due at the end of time, as all of us will. It is not up to us to say what she deserves.
I also don't think she looks like a horse; that's been said of Celine Dion as well, but C-D has a REALLY long face.

Happy Holidays!

ms. wii Dec 15th 2007 10:10AM

She's an unactive adulteress.

Cindy Dec 15th 2007 10:19AM

I don't see any improvement. She still looks as ugly and old as ever. If she got rid of the hat, we might actually get to see her.

Clarice Dec 15th 2007 11:32AM

Diana wouldn't look too hot at 60, either. Anyone questioning same should just look at pics of her mother.

TB Dec 15th 2007 12:13PM

To me the TWO fo them are pretty evel people and deserve each other , Charles is ugly himself so the two of them Match. They both need a personality make-over never mind there looks. What HE did to Diana will never be forgiven from the world who loved HER. Cheating Bastard

TB Dec 15th 2007 12:25PM

People
It is NOt there looks that is UGLY, it is there way's that is downright disgusting on BOTH part's.
So sorry Diana fell for this and thought she could change him, she was young and we all think that way and it did her in.
Both deserve each other, TWO UGLY people

Steve Dec 15th 2007 8:49PM

Camilla is still the whore she has been her entire life! Money, jewelry, "new hair" and yoga won't erase that blemish she will carry the rest of her life!

What a dog!

Maria Dec 15th 2007 1:05PM

As an old rancher friend of mine once said, "By gosh, I do believe that woman could eat oats out of a coke bottle!"

photostitch Dec 15th 2007 2:27PM

The British are not famous for gorgeous women. However, Camilla could have had a much better price if she had not hired the world's best for all her needs. What is wrong with bargain hunting? Does anyone really need to know the cost?

Sadly, we are all growing older, and Mother Nature can be cruel. So, stay out of the sun and lay off the makeup, and develop a routine for your skin that works well, to minimize wrinkles - and don't forget the weekly dermabrasion. Above all, wear age-appropriate clothing; if you don't have million dollar legs, no one needs to see the vericose veins, heavy thighs, etc. Longer skirts are always a woman's best friend. For most, miniskirts are an eyesore, even in those under thirty.

Jeanie Dec 15th 2007 3:31PM

IF he cheated on Dianna, and Dianna cheated on him. Camilla cheated on her husband with Charles. Once a cheater, what makes Charles or Camilla think that either one of THEM will be faithful to each other now? Sounds like more of a huge peyton place than something of respect and deserving of that lifestyle, let alone having the public pay for it.

Victoria Dec 15th 2007 3:50PM

It's sad, but when I see her I don't think royality or honor. She is forever branded as the other woman for so many people. You can dress her up all you want, but in the text books that what she will be famous for!

Diana was no saint, but at least she was truly interested in helping improve the world. That's honorable, no matter what mistakes you've made. Unfortunately, Camilla's interest is in bettering herself and the world really doesn't care!

People loved Diana because of her compassionate heart. Camilla's heart pales in comparison, which is why she will never be loved by the people...it's sad, but it's the truth. You can't pretend to be something your not...

tmadona Dec 15th 2007 5:10PM

Maybe you should blame British Royalty for making decisions for Charles. Royalty wanted specific offspring and that's what they got.
Yes, poor Diana.
Yes, poor Charles.

I'm kind of impressed that Charles stood up to the world and married the woman he loved.

Joseph Leslie Dec 15th 2007 10:51PM

Charles has sh*t for brains, but it runs in the family. I am sure that he is a Closet Queen , as are other members of the Royal Family, and Camilla is the guy he always wanted! King Edward abdicated the throne for Wallace Simpson, who also looked like a man!
But Dianna was also a nut case, so all they lacked was the fruit! What a bunch of wierdos! They are the world's biggest welfare cases! Kick them out of the palace and make them work for a living!

The StarThrower Dec 15th 2007 11:07PM

Does anyone know the answer to this question...? Should something happen to Elizabeth before she retires and passes the throne on, who would ascend as king? Would it be Charles or William? Has it been decided?

patricia2ara Dec 18th 2007 4:16PM

Give me a break. This women is UGLY! Donate all to charity whats the point in spending all that money. I hope Charles never becomes king, he is such an idiot. He could have so many other women and his settled for this piece of garbage! LMAO

Lalah Dec 26th 2007 3:46AM

I agree with Jeanie, (above) about these two cheaters.
Diana's acts of beauty were her courage to be the first to publicly hug AIDS victims, to hold and comfort the injured, the terminally ill, teaching her sons about the plight of those in poverty, walking near minefields to heighten awareness. Diana was lovely and glamorous, yes, but her true beauty lay in her compassion for the suffering and her courage to try to do something.

Camilla is selfish; her primary occupations were being Charles whore, foxhunting (despicable!) and playing mistress at Highgrove while Diana wept with humilation.

What a useless bitch.