http://www.luxist.com/2007/09/19/william-shakespeares-signature-worth-3-million/ Luxist Comments for William Shakespeare's Signature Worth $3 Million http://www.luxist.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.luxist.com en-us Copyright 2013 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.luxist.com/2007/09/19/william-shakespeares-signature-worth-3-million/http://www.luxist.com/2007/09/19/william-shakespeares-signature-worth-3-million/Jan 29th 2008 9:45PMhttp://www.luxist.com/2007/09/19/william-shakespeares-signature-worth-3-million/http://www.luxist.com/2007/09/19/william-shakespeares-signature-worth-3-million/Feb 11th 2008 7:05AMhttp://www.luxist.com/2007/09/19/william-shakespeares-signature-worth-3-million/http://www.luxist.com/2007/09/19/william-shakespeares-signature-worth-3-million/Feb 22nd 2008 9:45AMhttp://www.luxist.com/2007/09/19/william-shakespeares-signature-worth-3-million/http://www.luxist.com/2007/09/19/william-shakespeares-signature-worth-3-million/

For your interest, I am selling the domains: ShakespearesAutograph.co.uk, ShakespearesAutograph.com, ShakespearesSignature.co.uk, WilliamShakespearesAutograph.co.uk and WilliamShakespearesSignature.co.uk . They are available for immediate transfer.

These brand new domains are without content or history, and would be ideal for any business involved in the sale or auction of rare and highly sought after autographs / signatures.

These are prime domains, featuring a strong, but memorable, generic term, and would prove an excellent asset, helping to drive valuable customers to your website.

If you are interested in purchasing these for your business, or could recommend them to a colleague, I would strongly advise an early contact.

These domains are currently 'Parked' at Sedo.co.uk
Best Regards,

Nick Fowler
Please make any offers c/o
Nick Fowler at Brilliant Domains
www.brilliantdomains.co.uk
Email: brilliantdomains@btconnect.com
]]>Mar 20th 2009 10:00AMhttp://www.luxist.com/2007/09/19/william-shakespeares-signature-worth-3-million/http://www.luxist.com/2007/09/19/william-shakespeares-signature-worth-3-million/
Perhaps that signature isn't worth as much as once was thought?!?]]>Sep 25th 2007 12:35PMhttp://www.luxist.com/2007/09/19/william-shakespeares-signature-worth-3-million/http://www.luxist.com/2007/09/19/william-shakespeares-signature-worth-3-million/this is not new talk. its a whole bunch of people who are too ignorant to comprehend how intelligent other humans could possibly be.
they are like moon landing conspiracy theorists. if the argument is 'the plays are too smart to have been written by someone who didn't go to school' then Da Vinci couldn't have drawn a helicopter because he didn't have a pilots license and Paine couldn't have written his essays because he didn't live in a democracy. You can't teach someone to do something that hasn't been done before. His work is not the product of executed convention... it is revolutionary and an invention of intelligence in and of itself. The writer of the work is clearly a savant, and anyone who reads it can see that his details in feilds beyond the english language are not always accurate and the parts that are accurate could easily be attributed to someone who simply reads a lot and has friends in an international court.
If he didn't write them, then who did? A group of actor's and writers working together? Because one man could not have complete these?
I find it even harder to believe that a group of people... or even TWO people could create work as cohesive and complete as his work. The great works of human achievement are always out of the mind of a single artist or thinker, and they are always of too large a scope for the ignorant to accept.
One man wrote these plays. And every piece of evidence and logic from over 400 years of well documented history points to that man being William Shakespeare. I refuse to believe that the most amazing collection of work in the history of communicable language was written by someone who refused to take personal credit for it, and instead created and progressed a patsy that fooled Queen Elizabeth, Ben Jonson, Christopher Marlowe, the entire English Court, and 400 years of literary scholars, until a group of oxymoronic University theatre teachers, who spend most of their days misteaching the meaning of the word 'wherefor', decided that Hamlet is too intelligent for someone who didn't have a college a degree to have written it.
It's confounding... insulting even. Lay off it, already.]]>Jun 16th 2009 5:19AMhttp://www.luxist.com/2007/09/19/william-shakespeares-signature-worth-3-million/http://www.luxist.com/2007/09/19/william-shakespeares-signature-worth-3-million/Mar 24th 2010 8:02PMhttp://www.luxist.com/2007/09/19/william-shakespeares-signature-worth-3-million/http://www.luxist.com/2007/09/19/william-shakespeares-signature-worth-3-million/Sep 26th 2007 3:42PMhttp://www.luxist.com/2007/09/19/william-shakespeares-signature-worth-3-million/http://www.luxist.com/2007/09/19/william-shakespeares-signature-worth-3-million/Sep 25th 2007 1:46PMhttp://www.luxist.com/2007/09/19/william-shakespeares-signature-worth-3-million/http://www.luxist.com/2007/09/19/william-shakespeares-signature-worth-3-million/Sep 27th 2007 3:07AMhttp://www.luxist.com/2007/09/19/william-shakespeares-signature-worth-3-million/http://www.luxist.com/2007/09/19/william-shakespeares-signature-worth-3-million/Sep 25th 2007 7:06PMhttp://www.luxist.com/2007/09/19/william-shakespeares-signature-worth-3-million/http://www.luxist.com/2007/09/19/william-shakespeares-signature-worth-3-million/
who is the fool that would pay 3m for anyones signature?]]>Sep 26th 2007 12:26AM