Inn at Chicago Magnificent Mile Tries To Shed Its Past

The 357-room Inn of Chicago, formerly under management by Best Western, has reopened after a renovation, as an independent boutique hotel. The hotel is now known as the rather cumbersome Inn of Chicago Magnificent Mile. New features include a poshed-up lobby, InnBar lounge, reappointed guest rooms and bathrooms, and the creation of 58 executive guest rooms, There is also Lavazza Café downstairs for coffee and snacks. The hotel's 1980s-style teal and pink rooms have been given a more muted brown and green color scheme and the bathrooms are now all white and spa-ed out. And there are penthouse rooms with a Queen size bed and bathroom with separate stall shower and sunken tub, and an oversized living room with refrigerator. Rates are low currently, they start at $159 a night. Will this be enough to help out a hotel with a decidedly two-star reputation?
Live from Microsoft's New Generation Xbox event!
The List #0147: Escape a Car Underwater
Xbox Reveal liveblog on Joystiq
Xbox One architecture panel liveblog!
H&M's Plus-Size Model Jennie Runk Says She Chose To Gain Weight
Visit the Maldive Islands Before It's Too Late
Okla. Sheriff's Deputy Finds Dog Guarding Body Buried Under Destroyed Home
Reptiles Make Home in UK Man's Cable Box
Xbox One event roundup: Microsoft reveals its next-gen gaming console
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Viv Jul 29th 2007 6:07PM
whoa there...
Did Austin Powers arrive to shag the hotel lobby into animal-printed submission??
Dan Jul 30th 2007 9:20AM
I stayed here a couple weeks ago, and this is still decidedly a 2-star or 3-star establishment. I've stayed at several of the hotels in that area and price range, and this the worst. It might be a few $ cheaper per night than the average in that area, though.
Oh, and the lobby certainly doesn't look that good in person.
Eric Jul 30th 2007 10:49AM
That hit the skip button as soon as I saw the zebra/tiger/faux animal print covering on the stool/seat stuff. Not because I am an animal activist (I'm not) but because it's just tacky.