<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Luxist - Comments for The Imperial, The Luxury Car That Never Was</title>
<link>http://www.luxist.com/2007/07/22/the-imperial-the-luxury-car-that-never-was/</link>
<description>Luxist Comments for The Imperial, The Luxury Car That Never Was</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Imperial, The Luxury Car That Never Was]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2007/07/22/the-imperial-the-luxury-car-that-never-was/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2007/07/22/the-imperial-the-luxury-car-that-never-was/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wait!  They still sell Dodge Durangos and 300s.  Would the Imperial have used that much more fuel?  So GM can sell Hummers and Suburbans and the Luxury marquees can sell leviathans but Chrysler can't?  Something's fishy here.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 22nd 2007 12:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Imperial, The Luxury Car That Never Was]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2007/07/22/the-imperial-the-luxury-car-that-never-was/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2007/07/22/the-imperial-the-luxury-car-that-never-was/</guid><description><![CDATA[And thank god it didn't. While the 300 is a cheap impression of a Bentley, this is an ugly parody of the Phantom. I think it would have stuck around had they used the original Imperial as the baseline it would have been a success.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nerditry]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 22nd 2007 12:36PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>