http://www.luxist.com/2007/04/24/myjets-fractional-seat-ownership/ Luxist Comments for MyJets Fractional Seat Ownership http://www.luxist.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.luxist.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.luxist.com/2007/04/24/myjets-fractional-seat-ownership/http://www.luxist.com/2007/04/24/myjets-fractional-seat-ownership/Apr 24th 2007 4:49PMhttp://www.luxist.com/2007/04/24/myjets-fractional-seat-ownership/http://www.luxist.com/2007/04/24/myjets-fractional-seat-ownership/Apr 24th 2007 6:59PMhttp://www.luxist.com/2007/04/24/myjets-fractional-seat-ownership/http://www.luxist.com/2007/04/24/myjets-fractional-seat-ownership/A turbine is a jet engine with a prop in the front and it is more fefficient than the jet alone.
I called the company and they say they will have VLJs (small jets) when available but it will be more expensive.
i'll try them
John]]>May 1st 2007 1:06PMhttp://www.luxist.com/2007/04/24/myjets-fractional-seat-ownership/http://www.luxist.com/2007/04/24/myjets-fractional-seat-ownership/May 1st 2007 2:57PMhttp://www.luxist.com/2007/04/24/myjets-fractional-seat-ownership/http://www.luxist.com/2007/04/24/myjets-fractional-seat-ownership/Sounds very good to me. That is something I have already tried. Very efficient and low cost.
You save a lot of time by having your own jet close to your home, not loosing time with extra security controls.
Cost are more than reasonnable. I would just suggest everyone to make a study of its own trips and make a comparison between commercial and this way of proposal.
Paul]]>May 7th 2007 4:20AM