<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Luxist - Comments for NightCove Circadian Clock</title>
<link>http://www.luxist.com/2007/02/12/nightcove-circadian-clock/</link>
<description>Luxist Comments for NightCove Circadian Clock</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NightCove Circadian Clock]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2007/02/12/nightcove-circadian-clock/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2007/02/12/nightcove-circadian-clock/</guid><description><![CDATA[Dear Nicole,<br>This is a great post!<br>Just one thing that would be important to correct regarding the post: all the aspects you mention are correct except that NightCove doesn't 'fade(s) in and out during the night to correspond with REM activity'.<br>NightCove doesn't produce light while sleeping but only during the 'falling-asleep phase' and the 'waking-up phase'. Other room environment parameters (like temperature, air) can be adjusted during sleep but not light. Light during the night could indeed have a negative impact on the biological clock.<br>Regards<br>ZYKEN - NightCove by ZYKEN<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ZYKEN - NightCove by ZYKEN]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 14th 2007 2:49PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>