<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Luxist - Comments for Samsung Wireless HDTV</title>
<link>http://www.luxist.com/2006/08/17/samsung-wireless-hdtv/</link>
<description>Luxist Comments for Samsung Wireless HDTV</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung Wireless HDTV]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2006/08/17/samsung-wireless-hdtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2006/08/17/samsung-wireless-hdtv/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is really nice, but it is still not worth the extra money. If somehow there would be a way to have it completely wireless, i.e. no power cord. That would be unique.<br><br>E<br><a href="http://www.brandpremium.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.brandpremium.com</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Spivy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 17th 2006 12:50PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>