<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Luxist - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.luxist.com/2006/03/27/hublot-bigger-bang-watch/</link>
<description>Luxist Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2006/03/27/hublot-bigger-bang-watch/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2006/03/27/hublot-bigger-bang-watch/</guid><description><![CDATA[Is it just me or have Hublot's watches always seemed unnecessarily bulky?  I have a Panerai and that's a large watch, but it's sleek at the same time, none of this huge bolt silliness that Hublot insists on.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Evans]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 27th 2006 11:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2006/03/27/hublot-bigger-bang-watch/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2006/03/27/hublot-bigger-bang-watch/</guid><description><![CDATA[Do we know the MSRP?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Christopher]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 27th 2006 12:00PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>